Effect of Physicians’ Prescribing Choices of First- or Second-Line Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Biologics Versus Non-Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Biologic Therapies on Psoriatic Arthritis Patient-Reported Outcomes

Author(s)

Patel R1, Hughes M2, Han C3, Quinones E2, Edwards M2, Massey N2, Adejoro O1
1Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Horsham, PA, USA, 2Adelphi Real World, Bollington, UK, 3Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Wayne, PA, USA

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate how physicians’ first- or second-line prescribing preferences for Tumor Necrosis Factor inhibitor (TNFi) versus non-TNFi (i.e. interleukin-23 or interleukin-17 inhibitor) biologics affect the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of their psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients.

METHODS: Data were drawn from the Adelphi PsA Disease Specific Programme™, a real-world point in time survey of rheumatologists and dermatologists, and their consulting patients with PsA in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom and United States in 2021. Physicians provided data on their first- and second-line PsA treatment preferences. Patients independently completed PROMs. Linear regression analyses were used for the EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level Quality of Life Survey (EQ-5D-5L), Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) and Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID12). Logistic regressions were used for individual EQ-5D-5L domains. Advanced therapies were categorised into TNFi and non-TNFi therapies.

RESULTS: Patients of physicians who preferred to prescribe TNFi at first line observed a significant 0.052-point decrease in EQ-5D-5L (p=0.044), a 7.6 percentage point increase in activity impairment due to PsA (p=0.020) and a 0.570-point increase in PsAID12 (p=0.049). There was a 1.95-fold increase in the odds that patients would experience problems with mobility (p=0.033), a 2.07-fold increase in the odds that they would have issues with self-care (p=0.036) and a 2.27-fold increase in the odds that patients would have pain/discomfort (p=0.05). Physician preference for second-line TNFi versus non-TNFi biologics had no significant impact on patients’ health related quality of life (HRQoL).

CONCLUSIONS: Physician preferences for first-line TNFi in PsA patients were associated with a significant negative impact on PROMs, including decreased HRQoL, and increased activity impairment, likelihood of pain and issues with mobility and self-care. These findings suggest that PsA patients may observe improvements in PROMs from the use non-TNFi (i.e. interleukin-23 or interleukin-17 inhibitor) biologics versus TNFi biologics as first-line biologic therapy.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2023-05, ISPOR 2023, Boston, MA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 6, S2 (June 2023)

Code

PCR93

Topic

Patient-Centered Research, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes, Stated Preference & Patient Satisfaction, Surveys & Expert Panels

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×