An Overview of Systematic Literature Review of Economic Evaluation of Treatment on Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementia

Author(s)

Diaby V1, Almutairi R2, Sanogo V3
1Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Princeton, NJ, USA, 2MCPHS UNIVERSITY, Boston, MA, USA, 3Self employed, GAINESVILLE, FL, USA

OBJECTIVES: Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) constitute a public health crisis affecting the US aging population and society The pharmacological managements of Alzheimer’s disease include two symptomatic approaches: The inhibition of acetylcholinesterase and the inhibition of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. Primarily this study aims to assess the economic evaluation literature of treating ADRD. The secondary aim is to compare the model structure and input parameters.

METHODS: We conducted an overview of systematic reviews according to the PRISMA extension statement for health care interventions. Literatures were searched using Cochrane Library, Embase, and PubMed databases from 1/1/2012 – 12/5/2022, for systematic reviews documenting economics evaluations of pharmacological treatment for ADRD key search terms. All articles were screened for title and abstract relevance by two authors, independently. Discrepancies in study selection were resolved by discussion and consultation with an independent investigator. Selected articles were subject to full-text screening. The quality checks were performed using Drummond and Philips checklists. Systematic reviews were included only if population were ADRD, interventions were pharmacological, study design as SLR or MA on CEA or CUA, outcomes for the effect were QALY or LYs and the criteria score was at least 50%.

RESULTS: Eight systematic reviews assessing studies on economic evaluation of treating ADRD were included. Three Cost effectiveness studies, one cost utility, two studies measuring quality of life as health outcome measure, and one was focusing on measuring the impact of social cost of ICER. Reviews were similar regarding their purpose, however different in objective statements and interventions compared. The sample sizes of the systematic reviews ranged between 455 and 4. Systematic reviews originated from United Kingdom, Germany, and Spain. one review was conducted over 4 years, and another review covered 22 years.

CONCLUSIONS: The study suggested that state-transition model type would be appropriate for modeling economic evaluation of treating ADRD.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2023-05, ISPOR 2023, Boston, MA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 6, S2 (June 2023)

Code

EE134

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Literature Review & Synthesis

Disease

Drugs, Mental Health (including addition), Neurological Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×