Screening for Clinically Relevant Drug-Drug Interactions between Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Antineoplastic Agents: A Pharmacovigilance Approach

Author(s)

Truong B1, Hornsby L1, Fox BI1, Chou C1, Zheng J2, Qian J3
1Auburn University, Harrison College of Pharmacy, Auburn, AL, USA, 2Auburn University, College of Sciences and Mathematics, Auburn, AL, USA, 3Auburn University Harrison College of Pharmacy, Auburn, AL, USA

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: Use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with cancer remains suboptimal due partly to concerns with their potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with antineoplastic treatments. However, the clinical relevance of these DDIs is unknown.

METHODS: We conducted a pharmacovigilance study of adverse event (AE) reports from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System from 01/01/2004 to 12/31/2021. AE reports containing both DOAC and antineoplastic agents with CYP3A4/P-gp inhibitory or inducing activity (i.e., kinase inhibitors (KIs), hormonal therapy, chemotherapeutic agents, immunomodulating agents (IMAs)) were included (n=36,066). The corresponding outcomes were bleeding or stroke, identified by MedDRA dictionary version 25.0. We employed disproportionality analyses (DPA), logistic regression models (LR), and Multi-item Gamma-Poisson Shrinker (MGPS) algorithms (Empirical Bayes Geometric Means (EBGM) and 90% credible intervals (90% CIs)) to identify safety signals of DDIs by antineoplastic therapeutic class and by individual drugs.

RESULTS: The highest bleeding rates in each drug class were the combination of DOACs with neratinib (39.08%, n=34), tamoxifen (21.22%, n=104), irinotecan (20.54%, n=83), and cyclosporine (19.17%, n=227). The highest rate of stroke was found for prednisolone (2.43%, n=113). No signal of DDIs by antineoplastic therapeutic class was detected using MGPS algorithms [EBGM (EB05-EB95)=1.02 (0.97-1.08) for DOACs-KIs, 1.22 (1.15-1.30) for DOACs-hormone, 1.22 (1.16-1.27) for DOACs-chemotherapy, 0.66 (0.63-0.69) for DOACs-IMAs, and 1.05 (0.90-1.21) for DOACs-inducers]. Findings from DPA and LR approaches agreed with MGPS. DOACs-neratinib was the only DDI signal detected [EBGM (EB05-EB95) = 2.71 (2.03-3.54)] for an individual antineoplastic drug.

CONCLUSIONS: No signal of DDIs between DOACs and antineoplastic agents was detected, except for DOAC-neratinib. Our findings support the hypothesis that most DDIs were not clinically relevant. The DDIs between DOACs and neratinib should be further examined in future research.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2023-05, ISPOR 2023, Boston, MA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 6, S2 (June 2023)

Code

EPH1

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Disease

Cardiovascular Disorders (including MI, Stroke, Circulatory), Drugs, Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×