Utilization of Medical Records Versus Insurance Claims for Outcomes Research: Learnings from Validation of an Ovarian Cancer Lines of Therapy Algorithm

Author(s)

Simmons D1, White J2, Walker V3, Blank S4, ElNaggar AC5, Munley J1, McLaurin K1
1AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2OPTUM, Eden Prairie, MN, USA, 3Optum, Eden Prairie, MN, USA, 4Mount Sinai and Blavatnik Family Women's Health Research, New York, NY, USA, 5WEST Cancer Center and Research Institute, Memphis, TN, USA

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: Answering complex questions with real-world evidence requires identifying appropriate data. Insurance claims contain resource utilization and costs, but can lack clinical details like line of therapy (LOT). Medical records may contain clinical information but are less likely to have costs. The objective was to validate an algorithm for LOT in ovarian cancer (OC) claims, and compare the occurrence of specific clinical events between claims and medical records.

METHODS: Utilizing the Optum Research Database, a claims-based algorithm to identify LOTs and type of therapy (active vs maintenance) among OC patients (diagnosed and received chemotherapy 12/1/14-9/15/17) was developed. A retrospective claims analysis linked with abstracted medical record data from patients’ oncologist was used for validation. Percentages were used to compare events and procedures between the claims and record data, while Cohen's kappa statistic was used to measure level of agreement for LOTs.

RESULTS: In total, 294 patients were included. The algorithm demonstrated substantial agreement between claims and records for total number of lines of active and maintenance therapy (weighted Kappa 0.65 and 0.62 p<0.0001). Records identified 189/294 (64.29%) patients as advanced OC (stage III/IV). Compared to records, claims identified higher 24-month mortality (19.22% vs 3.58%) and surgery during 33 months of follow-up (47.03% vs 29.33%). For most clinical events including fatigue, nausea, and hematologic events, records identified more patients with events during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS: Claims-based algorithms can reliably identify LOT in claims databases. Claims, which contain information from all patient interactions with the healthcare system, and not just a single oncologist, provided strong data on procedures and mortality compared to medical records. Medical records more accurately identified specific clinical events that may not appear in claims due to a lack of billable services. This research provides insights on the strengths and opportunities to consider when selecting specific datasets for oncology research.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-05, ISPOR 2022, Washington, DC, USA

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 6, S1 (June 2022)

Code

EE430

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Novel & Social Elements of Value

Disease

Drugs

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×