Systematic Literature Review of the Humanistic and Economic Impact of Angelman Syndrome

Author(s)

Buesch K1, Watts-James J2, Konstanski M3, Zhang R4, Martel MJ5
1PTC Therapeutics Switzerland GmbH, Steinhausen, Switzerland, 2Xcenda UK Ltd., Sutton Coldfield, WAR, UK, 3Xcenda GmbH, Hannover, Germany, 4PTC Therapeutics, Stockholm, AB, Sweden, 5Xcenda UK Ltd., London, UK

OBJECTIVES: Angelman syndrome (AS) is a rare genetic neurogenetic disorder causing developmental delays, speech impairments, movement disorder, and behavioral abnormalities. Systematic literature reviews (SLRs) were designed to summarize the evidence base and understand data gaps related to: (1) assessments of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and health utility, and (2) healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and/or costs associated with AS.

METHODS: Two SLRs, addressing HRQoL and HCRU in AS, were conducted in September 2021 using Medline and EMBASE. Screening and extraction (demographic, clinical and outcomes data) was performed by two independent reviewers, with screening conflicts resolved by a third reviewer.

RESULTS: Overall, 152 publications (61 HRQoL and 91 HCRU studies) met the search criteria. After abstract screening, 31 full-text articles were screened and 18 publications, extracted. Population and outcome definitions varied between studies. Twelve studies (publication: 1999-2021; sample sizes: 5-301) reported HRQoL data for AS patients or their families (7 studies) or in patients with behavioral disorders including AS (5 studies). Over 25 different instruments were used to assess HRQoL, most used was the ABC-C (Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Community; 3 studies). Five studies assessed sleep using different instruments. No studies reported health utilities. Six HCRU studies were identified (publication: 2002-2021; sample sizes: 27-527). Three studies reported hospitalization rates and two costing studies respectively reported testing costs and costs for patient and social care.

CONCLUSIONS: AS data on the impacts on HRQoL and HRCU is limited and inconsistent. Studies rely on small samples, owing to AS’ orphan disease nature, and high data heterogeneity is due to considerable differences in AS testing/reporting. Gaps include limited standardization in HRQoL instruments used, lack of health utilities and in-depth HCRU assessments, highlighting the need to further gain insights into the humanistic and economic burden of AS.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-05, ISPOR 2022, Washington, DC, USA

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 6, S1 (June 2022)

Code

EPH127

Topic

Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Literature Review & Synthesis

Disease

Rare and Orphan Diseases

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×