Systematic Review on Cost-Effectiveness of Glucagon‑Like Peptide‑1 (GLP‑1) Receptor Agonists

Author(s)

Winberg D1, Shi L2
1Tulane University, Darnestown, MD, USA, 2Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to review the long-term cost-effectiveness of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D).

METHODS: The PRISMA guideline was used in the partial update of a systematic review by Hong, et al. from 2019 assessing the cost-effectiveness of T2D drugs focused on GLP-1 receptor agonists. The search strategy included the Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) term ‘economics,’ ‘cost,’ ‘cost-effectiveness,’ ‘value,’ and ‘cost-utility,’ as well as all names for GLP-1s. The search strategy was used in the PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL Plus databases (from 2 June 2018 to 7 December 2021). Studies assessing GLP-1 drugs from the initial review were included.

RESULTS: In total, 80 articles were found that used a validated diabetes model to determine if short-term treatment effects from clinical trials such as HbA1c reduction led to the long-term cost-effectiveness of GLP-1s versus other T2D drugs. Of the 80 articles, 51 were from the initial review and 29 were from the updated search. Comparative drugs included other GLP-1s (n=30), insulin (n=31), sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitors (SGLT2) (n=14), dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 (DPP4) (n=13), sulfonylureas (n=5), and thiazolidinediones (TZD) (n=3). Newer GLP-1s were considered cost-effective compared to existing GLP-1s. GLP-1 was considered cost-effective, and dominant compared to TZDs and sulfonylureas. In studies comparing GLP-1s to SGLT2s, GLP-1s were cost-effective. However, 5 studies found it non-dominant to SGLT2s. Although GLP-1s were cost-effective compared to DPP4s, 2 studies found that DPP4s were more cost-effective than GLP-1s. 30 of the 31 studies comparing GLP-1s to insulin found GLP-1s to be a cost-effective treatment; 1 article found GLP-1s not to be cost-effective.

CONCLUSION: The review shows strong and consistent evidence that long term, GLP-1s are cost-effective for patients with uncontrolled T2D. A more complete update of the review should focus on the cost-effectiveness of other T2D drugs.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-05, ISPOR 2022, Washington, DC, USA

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 6, S1 (June 2022)

Code

EE227

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Literature Review & Synthesis

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×