Targeted Therapy and Treatment Trends in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer in Taiwan: A Population-Based Retrospective Study

Author(s)

Hu SH1, Chen CY2, Huang MY3, Hsieh HM4
1Master Program in Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung City, KHQ, Taiwan, 2Master Program in Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 3Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 4Department of Public Health, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: Taiwan's National Health Insurance has covered targeted therapy, namely cetuximab, for locally advanced head and neck cancers (LAHNC) since July 2009. This study aimed to estimate the trends of first-course treatment modalities before and after cetuximab was reimbursed in Taiwan and examine factors associated with targeted therapy among patients with LAHNC.

METHODS: A population-based retrospective study was conducted using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. Patients over 20 years old who were newly diagnosed with LAHNC during 2008-2016 and received treatments within six months were included. They were divided into three groups: 1) being diagnosed during 2008-2010; 2) targeted therapy group since 2011; 3) non-targeted therapy group since 2011. The treatment trends were estimated using the Cochran-Armitage trend test. Multiple logistic regression was performed to evaluate odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for treatment selection effects after 2011. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS: 23,448 patients were included in the study (group 1: 6,661 patients; group 2: 15,422 patients; group 3: 1,365 patients). Around 230 (8.2%) patients received targeted therapy each year, increasing annually from 2011 to 2016 (p-value= 0.02). Most (91.1%) patients also received radiotherapy while few (24.9%) of them were given surgery within six months, showing significant differences from non-targeted therapy group (surgery: 62.3%; radiotherapy: 73.8%; p-value < 0.001). It was shown that older patients with more comorbidities would receive targeted therapy than those who did not (p-value < 0.001). Patients with hypopharynx and oropharynx cancers were more likely to receive targeted therapy compared to oral cavity cancer (OR[95% CI]: 2.76 [2.40-3.18]; p-value < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: The treatment patterns between targeted and non-targeted therapy groups differed significantly. Most patients did not receive targeted therapy even after cetuximab was reimbursed. Further studies evaluating the effectiveness of targeted therapy were needed.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-05, ISPOR 2022, Washington, DC, USA

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 6, S1 (June 2022)

Code

EPH68

Topic

Epidemiology & Public Health

Topic Subcategory

Safety & Pharmacoepidemiology

Disease

Biologics and Biosimilars, Drugs

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×