Cost Analysis of Heart Failure Management in Malaysia: A Multi-Centered Retrospective Study

Author(s)

Ong SC1, Low JZ2, Yew WY3, Yen CH4, Muhamad AS5, Liew HB4, Abdul Ghapar AK6
1Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor, Pulau Pinang, 02, Malaysia, 2Universiti Sains Malaysia, ALOR SETAR, 02, Malaysia, 3Hospital Queen Elizabeth, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia, 4Hospital Queen Elizabeth ll, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia, 5Hospital Pulau Pinang, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Georgetown, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia, 6Hospital Serdang, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Kajang, Selangor, Malaysia

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: Estimation of the economic burden of heart failure (HF) through a complete evaluation is essential for improved treatment planning in the future. This estimation also helps in reimbursement decisions for newer HF treatments. This study aims to estimate the cost of HF treatment in Malaysia. The estimation was from the Ministry of Health’s perspective, categorised according to ejection fraction (EF) and the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification.

METHODS: A prevalence-based, bottom-up cost analysis study was conducted in three tertiary hospitals in Malaysia. Chronic HF patients who received treatment between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2018 were included in the study. The direct cost of HF was estimated from the utilisation of healthcare resources by patients throughout a one-year follow-up of patient medical records.

RESULTS: A total of 329 patients were included in the study. The mean ± standard deviation of total cost per HF patient per-year (PPPY) was USD 1956 ± USD 1251, of which inpatient cost accounted for 74.5% of the total cost. Medication costs (42.0%) and procedure cost (41.2%) contributed to the largest proportion of outpatient and inpatient costs. HF patients with preserved EF had the highest mean total cost of PPPY, at USD 2512 ± USD 820. The mean cost PPPY of NYHA class II was USD 2030 ± USD 1525, the highest among all the functional classes. Patients with underlying coronary artery disease had the highest mean total cost, at USD 2423 ± USD 1452, compared to other comorbidities. Hospitalisation, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary angiogram, and comorbidities were the cost predictors of HF.

CONCLUSION: Inpatient cost was the driver of healthcare cost for HF. Therapeutic strategies such as the prevention of HF-related hospitalisation and mitigation of disease progression are vital for reducing costs. This can be achieved by targeting HF risk factors.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-05, ISPOR 2022, Washington, DC, USA

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 6, S1 (June 2022)

Code

EE141

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Electronic Medical & Health Records

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×