Identification of a Warm Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia (wAIHA) Population Using Predictive Analytics of a Known Clinically Profiled Cohort
Author(s)
McCrae KR1, Gooljarsingh T2, Jones GK3, Tjoa ML4
1Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA, 2Clinical Communications and Patient Advocacy, Editas Medicine, and Janssen Global Services, LLC, Cambridge, MA, USA, 3IPM AI, Cambridge, MA, USA, 4Janssen Global Services, LLC, Cambridge, MA, USA
Presentation Documents
Objectives: The disease burden of wAIHA is not well known due to the difficulty of identifying patients in the absence of a diagnostic code for wAIHA. Our goals were to 1) identify a wAIHA cohort, 2) bisect severe versus non-severe patients, 3) compare comorbidities, anemia symptoms, treatments, diagnostic tests, and healthcare provider visits in these two groups, and 4) use a predictive model to validate clinical variables and prevalence estimates. Methods: A de-identified, longitudinal, patient-level claims database of >300 million US patients was used to identify patients with wAIHA. Classification as severe required transfusion, frequent blood testing, frequent interactions with a hematologist, and/or >2 ER visits/year. Codes for anemia symptoms, comorbidities, treatments, and diagnostic tests were grouped and analyzed. Prevalence was estimated using Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning (AI/ML) lookalike modeling. Results: We identified 1,548 patients with wAIHA (n= 631 severe; n= 917 non-severe). The rate of disease-relevant claims was higher in severe patients; specifically, anemia symptomatology codes were 61% higher and wAIHA specific testing and monitoring codes were 570% higher over 12 months. Primary hypertension, hyperlipidemia, gastro-esophageal reflux, and evidence of chemotherapy use were more common in severe patients, while lupus was more common in non-severe patients. Severe patients also had a higher rate of claims related to Hospital/Emergency care. AI/ML modeling predicted patients using relevant claims variables and provided prevalence estimates comparable to reported US estimates of 30,000-49,000 patients. Conclusions: We developed and validated a method for defining wAIHA patients using de-identified claims data. While disease manifestations were similar in severe and non-severe patients, the rate of occurrence was higher in severe patients, who also had higher healthcare resource utilization. Comorbidity with lupus was more common with non-severe wAIHA. This may indicate that a known diagnosis that requires monitoring could prevent the development of severe wAIHA.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2022-05, ISPOR 2022, Washington, DC, USA
Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 6, S1 (June 2022)
Code
EPH63
Topic
Epidemiology & Public Health
Topic Subcategory
Disease Classification & Coding
Disease
Rare and Orphan Diseases