Relationship/Association between Clinical Potential of Orphan Drugs and Registration Status Assigned By the European Medicines Agency: Selected Aspects

Author(s)

Jakubowski S, Kawalec P, Malinowski K
Jagiellonian University Medical College Institute of Public Health, Kraków, Poland

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: While there have been some attempts to investigate potential factors influencing the registration status of orphan drugs, clinical data for these drugs (such as evidence on effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness) are limited. We aimed to assess the association between available clinical data for orphan drugs and the registration status assigned by the European Medicines Agency (EMA).

METHODS: The analysis included medicines with an orphan designation for June 1, 2020, in the EMA registry. Clinical data were collected from the EPAR reports for each drug, containing such information as clinical trial characteristics or drug safety and efficacy. Data were categorized, and statistical analysis was performed.

RESULTS: We identified 968 studies reporting the results of 1342 clinical evaluations of 105 orphan drugs in a total number of almost 130 000 patients. There were 447 open-label studies (46%), 151 randomized controlled trials (16%), 37 retrospective studies (4%), and 178 dose-response studies (18%). Single or double blinding was used in 209 studies (22%), while placebo in 180 trials (19%). At least one control group was included in 294 studies (30%). In multiple logistic regression, each additional dose-response trial was associated with a 33-fold increase in the odds for authorisation with additional monitoring (OR=33.1, 95%CI: 1.90-833.99; p=0.02). Each additional study with a safety endpoint assessed within 2 months was associated with a 63% reduction in the odds for exceptional circumstances status (OR=0.37, 95%CI: 0.10-0.93; p=0.03). Each additional percent point for a study with a study duration longer than 2 years was associated with a 98% reduction in the odds for accelerated assessment (OR=0.02, 95%CI: 0.00-0.50; p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS: Our innovative quantitative analysis of the EMA authorization decision-making process revealed that the characteristics of a clinical trial and the quality of collected evidence can be significantly associated with the odds for a specific authorization status.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-05, ISPOR 2022, Washington, DC, USA

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 6, S1 (June 2022)

Code

HPR14

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Health Policy & Regulatory

Topic Subcategory

Approval & Labeling, Clinical Outcomes Assessment

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×