Impact of Formulary Adoption of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Medication Uptake and Adherence Among Medicare Patients with Chronic Heart Failure (CHF)
Author(s)
Ferro C1, Dieguez G1, Nguyen C2, Caplen M1, Shen X3
1Milliman, Inc., New York, NY, USA, 2Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation/Baylor Scott and White Health/The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA, 3Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: Sacubitril/Valsartan (SAC/VAL) is the preferred renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor (RAASi) for treatment of adult CHF. This study aimed to assess impacts of formulary adoption of SAC/VAL on uptake and adherence as well as overall utilization of RAASi in Medicare patients with CHF.
METHODS: Retrospective cohort study using Medicare administrative claims data. The “exposed” group included patients with CHF enrolled in Part D prescription drug plans (PDPs) that adopted SAC/VAL on their formulary in March 2016 (“intervention”). The “control” group included patients with CHF enrolled in PDPs with no coverage of SAC/VAL throughout 18-month follow-up. To control for patient selection, analysis was limited to non low-income subsidy patients enrolled in “exposed” or “control” plans for the entire analysis period pre- and post-intervention. Chi-squared and t- tests were performed to compare the uptake of SAC/VAL within 6, 12, and 18 months post-intervention, 12-month medication adherence among new SAC/VAL users, and overall utilization of RAASi.
RESULTS: For the “exposed” and “control” groups, we identified 111,826 and 12,595 patients, respectively. The groups had comparable demographic and risk profiles (mean age: 79 vs. 81 years; 52% vs. 53% female; mean risk score: 2.2 vs. 2.3). SAC/VAL uptake rates per 1,000 patients with CHF were higher for the “exposed” vs. “control” group: 4.0 vs. 2.9 at 6 months, 9.1 vs. 6.9 at 12 months, and 14.9 vs. 11.7 at 18 months (p-values: .08, .01, .01). Mean 12-month SAC/VAL proportion of days covered for new users was similar (72% vs. 70%; p-value: .72) and overall use of RAASi was slightly higher (63% vs. 61% of patients with CHF; p-value: <0.0001) for the “exposed” and “control” groups.
CONCLUSIONS: We observed slightly higher uptake of SAC/VAL and overall use of RAASi between groups following SAC/VAL addition to formulary, with minimal differences in SAC/VAL adherence.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 6, S1 (June 2022)
Code
PCR9
Topic
Patient-Centered Research, Study Approaches
Topic Subcategory
Adherence, Persistence, & Compliance
Disease
Drugs