Critical Appraisal of Real-World Evidence on the Clinical and Economic Outcomes Associated with Stent Use in Critical Limb Ischemia
Author(s)
Williams A1, Rojanasarot S(1, McGovern A1, Jaff MR2
1Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA, 2Boston Scientific, Maple Grove, MN, USA
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES
: Given the significant burden of critical limb ischemia (CLI), endovascular interventions with stent use remains challenging. Recognizing methodological and practical limitations which exist in conventional clinical trials, real-world evidence (RWE) is increasingly adopted in research for CLI management. This study assessed the quality and the comprehensiveness of RWE on the clinical and economic outcomes associated with below-the-knee (BTK) drug-eluting stents (DES) and bare-metal stents (BMS) in CLI patients.METHODS:
A systematic literature review was conducted to identify RWE studies on DES and BMS published in the United States between January 2011 and September 2021. A critical appraisal of studies was performed using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist and the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) assessment tool for cohort studies.RESULTS
: Of the 42 RWE studies identified, 8 (6 clinical and 2 economic) were critically analyzed: 67% (4) met the STROBE criteria for addressing confounders. The CASP tool highlighted: 1) study design issues (external validity), 2) limited information on the strategies to minimize selection, and 3) low external validity of the study findings. The STROBE checklist showed: 1) study design issues, 2) missing data not addressed, 3) limited information to minimize systematic bias and confounders, 4) missing flow chart of included and excluded participants, and 5) threats to external validity due to the choice of database.CONCLUSIONS
: This appraisal demonstrates that eligible RWE studies are well-designed, powered, and offer reliable evidence to discern a statistical difference to clinicians and payers on the clinical and economic outcomes of BTK DES and BMS in CLI patients. However, the evidence supporting the economic outcomes of BTK stents is limited. Since payers rely on economic studies to enhance resource decision-making, there is a need for more healthcare economic data on the value of endovascular interventions for the treatment of CLI.Conference/Value in Health Info
2022-05, ISPOR 2022, Washington, DC, USA
Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 6, S1 (June 2022)
Code
SA1
Topic
Medical Technologies, Methodological & Statistical Research, Study Approaches
Topic Subcategory
Confounding, Selection Bias Correction, Causal Inference, Literature Review & Synthesis, Medical Devices, Missing Data
Disease
Cardiovascular Disorders