Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Perioperative Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy (PGDT) for High-Risk Hip Replacement Surgery from the Public Healthcare Perspective in Mexico

Author(s)

Sanchez L1, Okumura L2, Dias Alves MR2, Deckert J3
1Edwards Lifesciences Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico, 2Edwards Lifesciences Brazil, São Paulo, Brazil, 3Edwards Lifesciences Europe, Nyon, Switzerland

OBJECTIVES: Since Perioperative Goal Directed Therapy (PGDT) is considered the standard care for patients submitted to high-risk surgeries for reducing intrahospital complications, we aimed at estimating the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the PGDT performed with HemosPhere platform, in high-risk hip replacement surgeries, from the institutional perspective in Mexico.

METHODS: A cost effectiveness analysis was conducted using a Markov decision tree model comparing PGDT vs. conventional hemodynamic monitoring in hip replacement surgery in a one-year time horizon. Effectiveness was defined as number of life years gained (LYG) and avoided complications. Costs evaluated included the catheter unit cost, hip replacement surgery, stroke, cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular complications and were obtained from DRGs. Clinical outcomes and benefits were obtained from a clinical trial evaluating PGDT vs. non-PGDT implementation in hip replacement surgery. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were developed to compare to the base case results. Costs are presented in MXN (Mexican Peso).

RESULTS: Results in the base case indicate that implementing PGDT to hip replacement surgery is associated with 4.3 LYG and a total cost of $420,958, while conventional monitoring is associated with 2.9 LYG and $512,783. PGDT gains 1.4 LY while generating $169,465 savings indicating that is a dominant alternative (more effective and less costly) compared to conventional monitoring in high-risk hip replacement surgery. PSA demonstrated PGDT was dominant in 100% of the simulations.

CONCLUSIONS: Implementing PGDT in high-risk hip replacement surgery is a dominant alternative compared to conventional monitoring as it improves patient LYs by reducing the probability of complications while presenting savings for the Mexican Institutions. Our analysis demonstrates that complications have a great impact on healthcare costs and that implementing PGDT during a high-risk surgery significantly reduces them. We expect these results to be reproducible in other high-risk surgeries as well.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2021-05, ISPOR 2021, Montreal, Canada

Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 5, S1 (May 2021)

Code

PSU8

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Medical Technologies

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Medical Devices

Disease

Medical Devices, Surgery

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×