Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Review in Patients with Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review (SLR)

Author(s)

Azmi S1, Barnes G2, Xuan D3, Tang B4
1BeiGene, Ltd., Emeryville, CA, USA, 2BeiGene, Ltd., Blue Bell, PA, USA, 3Ceres Health Research Consulting, Littleton, MA, USA, 4BeiGene USA, Emeryville, CA, USA

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES

HRQoL estimates are essential components of an effectiveness analysis for a new treatment. The purpose of this research was to review the HRQoL measures used in understanding ovarian cancer (OC) treated with poly(ADP) ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi).

METHODS

A SLR was conducted using the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, Study Design (PICOS) model. Cochrane Library, Medline via Embase, and PubMed were searched for articles in English (2012-July 2020) that addressed HRQoL measured by patient reported outcomes in recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancers in treatment with PARPis. All countries were included.

RESULTS

Six studies met the final criteria for inclusion. Three PARPis (olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib) were identified that assessed HRQoL. Instruments used were EuroQoL five-dimension scale (EQ-5D), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian (FACT-O), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian Cancer symptom index (FOSI), Trial Outcomes Index (TOI), and Quality-Adjusted Progression-Free Survival (QAPFS). Niraparib was comparable to placebo when measured via EQ-5D; niraparib and olaparib were comparable to placebo via FOSI; olaparib was comparable to placebo via FACT-O; olaparib was comparable to placebo via TOI. Olaparib (in 2 studies) and rucaparib had longer QAPFS than placebo. There was no single tool or result common across all assessed interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

Across all indices, olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib showed mixed results in terms of HRQoL outcomes compared to placebo. Although patients showed improvement in QAPFS with two PARPis their HRQoL did not seem to improve. This could be due to the drugs’ side-effects or method used to measure HRQoL in these studies. To better understand HRQoL and address the unmet needs in recurrent OC patients, additional research using more advanced methodology is needed.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2021-05, ISPOR 2021, Montreal, Canada

Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 5, S1 (May 2021)

Code

PCN222

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes

Disease

Drugs, Oncology, Personalized and Precision Medicine, Reproductive and Sexual Health

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×