Oncology Combinations: How to Ensure Timely Access?

Author(s)

Pistollato M1, Wilsdon T2, Steele R1, Bercher J3, van Meerveld M4, Roediger A5, Schulz S6, Hartevelt M7, Calvetto M7
1Charles River Associates, London, LON, UK, 2Charles Rivers Associates, London, UK, 3Charles River Associates, München, Germany, 4MSD, Kriens, Switzerland, 5MSD, Lucerne, Switzerland, 6MSD, Zurich, Switzerland, 7Merck & Co. Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA

Background: Oncology combination medicines increasingly represent the best treatment option for many patients, delivering significant benefits over monotherapies. However, there are challenges to ensuring patients have access to these medicines. Here, we investigate these challenges and propose potential solutions to ensure sustainable access to oncology combinations in the future.

Methods: This study is based on an analysis of the availability and access delays for combination products across Europe, Australia and Canada from 2015 to 2020. The current debate and national approaches were investigated with 18 cross-stakeholder interviews, to validate the analysis of the challenges and investigate the viability of potential policy solutions.

Results: On average, 70.2% of all oncology medicines receive positive recommendation, compared to only 59.9% of branded combinations; a discrepancy of over 10%. This is particularly pronounced in certain countries, including Australia and UK. Combination therapies also require an average 99 days extra between regulatory approval to reimbursement decision. All combinations face novel pricing and reimbursement challenges, but these can appear insurmountable for specific types of combinations. It is particularly challenging when constituents are owned by different manufacturers. Problems are exacerbated by lifecycle considerations and the presence of existing indications for each constituent.

Conclusions: Given the value of combination therapies, it is important to ensure patients have timely access to these vital treatments. Without appropriate policy solutions there may be further delays or restrictions. The challenges of combinations are clearly mitigated by: confidential rebates by combination, combination-based tracking of the usage, and value-based assessment of the combination, as an aggregated intervention. We show these are required but additional mechanisms will be needed. In some cases, voluntarily “competition-law-proof” negotiations between manufacturers or the establishment of a method for value attribution can be a way for accelerating access.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2021-05, ISPOR 2021, Montreal, Canada

Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 5, S1 (May 2021)

Code

PCN36

Topic

Health Policy & Regulatory

Topic Subcategory

Pricing Policy & Schemes, Reimbursement & Access Policy

Disease

Drugs, Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×