Analysis of Societal Costs Due to Work Productivity Loss and Activity Impairment from the Monaleesa-7 Trial of Ribociclib + Endocrine Therapy (ET) in Premenopausal Women with HR+/HER2− Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC) in the US

Author(s)

Curteis T1, Chandiwana D2, Pathak P3, Lanoue B2, Pencheva R4, Smith-Tilley J4
1Costello Medical, Manchester, UK, 2Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA, 3Novartis Ireland Ltd., Dublin, D, Ireland, 4Costello Medical, Cambridge, UK

OBJECTIVES: To estimate societal costs due to work productivity loss and activity impairment with ribociclib + ET compared with ET alone among premenopausal women with HR+/HER2− ABC from a US perspective.

METHODS: Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: General Health (WPAI:GH) data from 672 patients in the MONALEESA-7 trial were analysed (data cutoff, November 30, 2018). For patients receiving either ribociclib + ET or ET alone, societal costs were derived for progression-free disease, progressed disease, and early mortality, defined by treatment-specific estimates of median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS), using a human capital approach. Mixed-model repeated measures were used to estimate monthly work productivity loss and health-related unemployment (paid work) and activity impairment (unpaid work) up to the national retirement age (66 years). Costs are reported in US dollars ($) and discounted at 3% annually.

RESULTS: From treatment initiation (mean age, 43.15 years) to the national retirement age (66 years), an average premenopausal patient with ABC receiving ribociclib + ET had $33,092 lower societal costs due to work productivity loss, health-related unemployment, and activity impairment compared with ET alone. Societal costs for the average ribociclib + ET patient were $453,625 for paid work (including disease-related unemployment) and $247,244 for unpaid work, compared with $468,649 and $265,313 for ET alone, respectively. For an estimated 11,769 annual new cases of premenopausal HR+/HER2− ABC (SEER data), ribociclib + ET would potentially yield $389.45 million lower societal costs than ET alone.

CONCLUSIONS: Ribociclib + ET is associated with lower societal costs in both paid and unpaid work for HR+/HER2− patients with ABC compared with ET alone, largely driven by differences in health-related unemployment and activity impairment. This is attributed to the statistically significant prolongation of median PFS and OS observed with ribociclib + ET compared with ET alone in the MONALEESA-7 trial.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2021-05, ISPOR 2021, Montreal, Canada

Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 5, S1 (May 2021)

Code

PCN98

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Trial-Based Economic Evaluation

Disease

Drugs, Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×