Estimating the Difference in Annual out-of-Pocket Costs for Relugolix and Leuprolide for Medicare Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Author(s)

Borrelli E1, McGladrigan CG2
1University of Rhode Island College of Pharmacy, Cranston, RI, USA, 2Mass General North Shore Cancer Center, Danvers, MA, USA

OBJECTIVES

:
Relugolix is a once daily oral androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) approved in December 2020 in the U.S. for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Results from its head-to-head phase III randomized controlled trial demonstrated comparable efficacy to leuprolide injections given every three months. Relugolix provides a new alternative for ADT compared to currently available injectables, and it is therefore important to compare the difference in out-of-pocket (OOP) costs for patients between these two therapies.

METHODS

:
We estimated the OOP costs for the average Medicare patient receiving relugolix 120mg once daily or leuprolide 22.5mg every 3 months for 12-calendar months in 2021. Relugolix OOP costs were calculated based on the 2021 Medicare Part D cost sharing structure using relugolix’s January 2021 wholesale-acquisition-cost (WAC) of $2,313 for a 30-day supply. Leuprolide OOP costs were calculated based on the 2021 Medicare Part B deductible of $203 and patients paying 20% of treatment costs. Leuprolide’s January 2021 Medicare average-sale price (ASP) of $228.93 per 7.5mg (J9217) plus 6% was used to calculate the price of leuprolide. Calculations were made with the assumption that patients did not have any additional co-insurance or financial assistance and did not include calculation of insurance premiums or administration costs.

RESULTS

:
The total costs for 12-months of relugolix was estimated to be $27,756 while the total cost of 12-months leuprolide (4 injections) was estimated to be $2,912. The estimated annual OOP costs for relugolix was $3,731 while the estimated annual OOP costs for leuprolide was $745. Therefore, relugolix cost approximately $2,986 more OOP for one-year of treatment compared to leuprolide.

CONCLUSIONS

:
While relugolix is the first orally available ADT, its use is associated with a substantially higher OOP cost for Medicare patients. Prescribers should consider the full risk versus benefits when deciding between relugolix and leuprolide, including the potential financial implications for patients.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2021-05, ISPOR 2021, Montreal, Canada

Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 5, S1 (May 2021)

Code

PCN80

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×