Author(s)
Bodini A1, Michelucci E2, Caselli C3, Signore G4, Neglia D5, Smit JM6, Scholte AJ6, Mincarone P7, Leo CG8, Pelosi G9, Rocchiccioli S3
1National Research Council - Institute for Applied Mathematics and Information Technologies “Enrico Magenes”, Milano, Italy, 2National Research Council-Institute of Clinical Physiology, Pisa, Italy, 3National Research Council - Institute of Clinical Physiology, Pisa, PI, Italy, 4NEST - Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, Italy, 5Fondazione Toscana G. Monasterio, Pisa, Italy, 6Department of Cardiology, Heart Lung Centre, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 7National Research Council - Institute for Research on Population and Social Policies, Brindisi, Italy, 8National Research Council - Institute of Clinical Physiology, Lecce, LE, Italy, 9National Research Council - Institute of Clinical Physiology, Pisa, Italy
OBJECTIVES: Advancements in analytical technologies and increasing use of Machine Learning make available a wide set of new possible biomarkers from lipidomics as possible predictors of cardiometabolic disease risk. However, from a cost-effectiveness point of view, decisions on which tests to order should consider the improvement over the existing knowledge brought by these new biomarkers in predicting the outcome of interest. By state-of-the-art statistical methods we evaluated whether and which of a set of lipids, derived from targeted plasma lipidomics profile of stable CAD patients (H2020-689068-SMARTool project clinical trial), can significantly contribute to improve the performances of the Minimal Risk Tool (MRT), a pre-test model developed in a secondary analysis of the PROMISE trial to identify patients with chest pain but normal coronary arteries and no clinical events during follow-up hence deriving minimal benefit from diagnostic tests. METHODS: The association between a set of triglycerides, ceramides and sphyngomielines and the minimal risk endpoint was checked by the Mann–Whitney test. The MRT was validated by regression methods considering calibration in-the-large, overall and specific effect of predictors. The re-estimated model (reMRT) was used as a baseline model in a Likelihood Ratio Test to assess the added predictive value of each associated lipid. A sensitivity analysis was carried out by considering two alternative baseline models developed on the cohort. RESULTS: Triglycerides did not bring any significant improving contribution. The reMRT predictive capability was significantly improved by Cer(d18:1/16:0) and SM(40:2) (p ≤ 0.01), and weakly by SM(41:1) (p = 0.052). Other sphingolipids bringing significant predictive improvement to the alternative models were SM(34:1), SM(41:2), SM(38:2) and SM(42:4). CONCLUSIONS: Patient-specific plasma lipidomics is a promising source of diagnostic biomarkers, exploitable not only to assess the risk of obstructive CAD but also to rule-out subjects without coronary atherosclerosis, then meeting the need of a more appropriate use of imaging diagnostic testing.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2021-05, ISPOR 2021, Montreal, Canada
Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 5, S1 (May 2021)
Code
PCV38
Topic
Epidemiology & Public Health, Methodological & Statistical Research
Disease
Cardiovascular Disorders