Quality of Life and Costs of a Telemedicine Service for Ophthalmologic Diagnoses
Author(s)
Zanotto B1, Etges AP1, Ruschel K2, Silva R3, Oliveira M3, Moreira T4, Cabral F4, Araujo A5, Umpierre R3, Gonçalves M6, Harzheim E6, Polanczyk CA2
1National Health Technology Assessment Institute, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil, 2National Health Technology Assessment Institute, Porto Alegre, Brazil, 3TelessaúdeRS-UFRGS, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil, 4Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, Brazil, 5Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 6Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
OBJECTIVES : TeleOftalmo is a Brazilian project that provides telemedicine services in ophthalmology to improve population's access to diagnosis. Our study aimed to describe the impact on health and economic outcomes of TeleOftalmo compared with traditional medical visits at the Brazilian public health system METHODS : This prospective study analyzed patients assisted at the TeleOftalmo program and conventional ophthalmology in-person visits for three months. Utility data were collected before (t0) and at the 3-month (t3) clinical visit, using the Visual Function Questionnaire-Utility Index (VFQ-UI) instrument. Data from t(0) was collected between December 2019 and January 2020. Costs of health services were analyzed by the Time-driven Activity-based Costing method (TDABC). Results were converted to international dollars by the Purchasing Power Parity rate in 2019. RESULTS : 536 patients were included in the study, 252 from the in-person visits group, and 284 from TeleOftalmo. The mean utility score (SD) at t(0) for TeleOftalmo group was 0.808 (SD 0.14) and for in-person ophthalmologic visits it was 0.789 (0.15). At t(3) utility score was 0.812 (0.15) and 0.795 (0.16), respectively. The adjusted analysis for VFR-qualify of life did not demonstrate a significant difference between groups in repeated measures (unadjusted p=0.352 and adjusted p=0.710). The unit cost per telediagnosis at TeleOftalmo was Int$ 96.9 (IQR Int$ 82.5; Int$ 199.4), while an in-person visit cost Int$ 77.2 (IQR Int$ 74.9; Int$ 80.0). Considering service's full capacity, while redesigning the process, TeleOftalmo's unit cost could decrease to Int$ 53.3. This represents a cost reduction of 31%, assisting three times more patients monthly. CONCLUSIONS : Our study demonstrates that telemedicine must be considered a valuable health service delivery method for ophthalmologic diagnosis. Understanding its broader value might help local implementation progress, based on market and regional needs. TeleOftalmo has the potential to be a cost-saving strategy for the national health system.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2021-05, ISPOR 2021, Montreal, Canada
Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 5, S1 (May 2021)
Code
PMU44
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation, Health Service Delivery & Process of Care, Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Health State Utilities, Telemedicine
Disease
Multiple Diseases
Explore Related HEOR by Topic