REDEFINING TREATMENT SATISFACTION AND HOW IT IMPACTS TREATMENT ADHERENCE AND VALUE OF HEALTHCARE FOR PERSONS WITH HEMOPHILIA (PWH): FINDINGS FROM THE HEMACTIVE STUDY

Author(s)

O'hara J1, Llinas A2, Skinner M3
1HCD Economics, Daresbury, UK, 2Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá & Universidad de los Andes, School of Medicine, Bogotá, Colombia, 3Institute for Policy Advancement, Ltd, Washington, D.C., DC, USA

OBJECTIVES : Adherence is an important determinant in cost-effective analyses, which often assume perfect adherence when establishing value. For PwH, high rates (>50%) of nonadherence to prescribed regimens of prophylactic replacement factor can limit its effectiveness, compromising joints and restricting physical activity. The HemACTIVE study provided insight on how PwH define treatment satisfaction and its impact on adherence.

METHODS : Persons with moderate/severe hemophilia A, aged 2–65 years (caregivers for PwH <18y)from EU and North America, received a 25-minute, IRB-approved, web-based questionnaire. Reasons for treatment satisfaction were not assessed in Germany.

RESULTS : 275 PwH were enrolled (n=39 France, n=60 Italy, n=25 Germany, n=110 US, n=41 Canada; 29% children/caregivers; 61% severe hemophilia). Most were satisfied with current treatment, with varying degrees of satisfaction (24% extremely satisfied, 41% very satisfied, 32% satisfied, 4% unsatisfied). PwH were more likely to cite tolerability (minimal side effects: 67%; comfort: 62%) and/or efficacy (symptom minimization: 62%) as reasons for treatment satisfaction than its impact on freedom from restrictions (ability to treat whenever needed: 46%; ability to participate in activities: 44%). Strict adherence to prescribed regimens improved with degree of treatment satisfaction: 18% vs 36% vs 41% vs 52% for unsatisfied, satisfied, very satisfied, and extremely satisfied, respectively; PwH who were unsatisfied with their treatment were more likely to add infusions (27% vs 23% vs 15% vs 8%) or frequently miss scheduled infusions (18% vs. 4% vs 4% vs 2%). Occasional missed infusions were similar across PwH regardless of treatment satisfaction (range: 28%-36%).

CONCLUSIONS : Treatment adherence appears to be linked to treatment satisfaction--which PwH are more likely to define according to tolerability and/or efficacy of a product than impact on quality of life. By redefining treatment satisfaction to encompass freedom and flexibility in lifestyle, there is an opportunity to improve adherence, thus improving value of treatment.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2020-05, ISPOR 2020, Orlando, FL, USA

Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue 5, S1 (May 2020)

Code

PRO94

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Adherence, Persistence, & Compliance, Patient Behavior and Incentives, Stated Preference & Patient Satisfaction

Disease

Rare and Orphan Diseases

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×