NEW AIFA INNOVATION ALGORITHM: 2 YEAR REPORT CARD

Author(s)

Macaulay R1, Wang G2
1Parexel International, London, UK, 2Parexel International, London, LON, UK

OBJECTIVES: The Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA), is responsible for setting the national reimbursement status and pricing of pharmaceuticals. In 2007, AIFA granted more favorable reimbursement conditions for therapies deemed “innovative”. In April 2017, a new innovation algorithm was established alongside innovation funds. Therapies can now be designated “conditionally (or potentially) innovative” and gain immediate formulary inclusion as well as “innovative,” where they also can benefit from innovation funds (worth a total of €1 billion/year) and exemptions from excess expenditure clawbacks. This research evaluates all therapies granted AIFA innovative designation under this new algorithm.

METHODLOGY: Therapies with innovation designation were identified from the AIFA website and key information extracted (to 14-Jan-2020).

RESULTS: 30 drug:indication pairings have innovative designations (8 [2017], 16 [2018], 6 [2019]- for context, the EMA provided 66 positive opinions in 2019). 16/30 have “innovative” designations (12/16 were designated “innovative” for 3 years, 1/16 for 2.6 years [a follower product), 2/16 for 18 months, and 1/16 for 12 months; 12/16 were AIFA class H (reimbursed for hospital use). 8/16 were for oncology indications and 11/16 were for EMA-designated orphan indications]. 4/30 had “potential” innovation designations (4/4 were for 3 years. 3/4 were AIFA class H. 3/4 were for oncology indications and 3/4 were for EMA-designated orphan indications). 10/30 had “conditional” innovation designations (10/10 were for 18 months. 9/10 were AIFA class H; 8/10 were for oncology indications and 5/10 were for EMA-designated orphan indications).

CONCLUSIONS: AIFA is only applying innovative status to a minority of new therapies, most of which are either for oncology indications and/or EMA-designated orphan indications. This may reflect stringency in application of the new criteria. However, it may also reflect companies not applying for this designation. The limited scope of benefits (for example, the lack of pricing incentives) may contribute towards this.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2020-05, ISPOR 2020, Orlando, FL, USA

Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue 5, S1 (May 2020)

Code

PMU89

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Health Policy & Regulatory

Topic Subcategory

Novel & Social Elements of Value, Public Spending & National Health Expenditures, Reimbursement & Access Policy

Disease

Drugs, Oncology, Rare and Orphan Diseases

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×