USE OF CLINICAL GLOBAL IMPRESSIONS-SEVERITY (CGI-S) TO ASSESS RESPONSE TO ANTIDEPRESSANT TREATMENT IN PATIENTS WITH TREATMENT-RESISTANT DEPRESSION

Author(s)

Morrens J1, Mathews M2, Popova V3, Borentain S2, Rive B4, Gonzalez Martin Moro B5, Jamieson C6, Zhang Q2
1Janssen Belgium, Leuven, Belgium, 2Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA, 3Janssen Research & Development, BE, Beerse, Belgium, 4Janssen EMEA, Paris, France, 5Janssen EMEA, Madrid, Spain, 6Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Milpitas, CA, USA

OBJECTIVES: Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), a 10-item questionnaire (each scored on a 7-point scale [0-6]) is a validated tool for physicians to determine response to antidepressant treatment and is used widely in clinical trial settings. The Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) scale with one question scored on a 7-point response scale is a more practical tool for clinicians in real-world practice. The appropriateness of using CGI-S-based assessment for identifying responders to short-term antidepressant treatment among patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) was determined by evaluating agreement with the established MADRS-based assessment of response.

METHODS: Data from a phase-3 randomized, double-blind study (NCT02418585; TRANSFORM-2) of flexible-dosing esketamine (or placebo) nasal spray + a newly-initiated oral antidepressant for acute treatment in adults with moderate-to-severe TRD were analyzed. Patients with ≥50% reduction in MADRS from baseline at the end of the 4-week acute treatment phase were pre-specified as responders. For the alternative CGI‑S-based assessment of response, patients with ≥2 points decrease from baseline or a CGI-S score of ≤3 (mildly depressed to normal) were considered responders. Cohen's kappa coefficient was calculated to assess the level of agreement between MADRS- and CGI-S-based assessment. Sensitivity and specificity of the CGI-S-determined response was estimated, using MADRS-based classification as reference.

RESULTS: At the end of 4-week treatment, the proportion of responders among all study patients (n=201) was similar based on MADRS (61%) and CGI-S (62%). Substantial agreement between the two methods was observed (Cohen’s kappa= 0.76; sensitivity= 92%; specificity= 84%). Similar results were observed in esketamine-treated patients (n=101); proportion of responders: 69% (MADRS-based) and 68% (CGI-S-based), with substantial agreement (Cohen’s kappa=0.75; sensitivity= 91%; specificity= 84%).

CONCLUSIONS: The CGI-S could be a practical and reliable tool for clinicians to assess the response to short-term antidepressant treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe TRD, when MADRS is not feasible in real-world practice.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2020-05, ISPOR 2020, Orlando, FL, USA

Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue 5, S1 (May 2020)

Code

PND1

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Clinician Reported Outcomes

Disease

Neurological Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×