PREVALENCE OF DRUG RESISTANCE IN NUCLEOSIDE/NUCLEOTIDE ANALOGUE-TREATED EGYPTIAN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC HEPATITIS B VIRUS
Author(s)
Solayman MHM1, Nassar NES2, Abdel-kader SA3, Afify S4, Soltan H5, Abdelghany AES3, El-Wakeel LM6, Hassany M7
1German University in Cairo, Cairo, Egypt, 2Cleopatra Hospitals Group, Cairo, Egypt, 3Ministry of Health and Population, Cairo, Egypt, 4As-Salam International Hospital, Cairo , C, Egypt, 5Alrajhi University Liver Hospital, Assiut, Egypt, 6Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt, 7National Hepatology and Tropical Medicine Research Institute (NHTMRI), Cairo, Egypt
OBJECTIVES: Nucleoside/Nucleotide analogues (NAs) are used for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection (CHB), but the treatment may fail due to several factors, including viral resistance. Resistance pattern in Egyptian patients is still unknown; hence, the aim of the current study was to evaluate the prevalence of NAs resistance and its potential predictors in Egyptian patients with CHB. METHODS: A retrospective, cross sectional study on CHB Egyptian patients on NAs, including lamivudine, tenofovir, lamivudine/ adefovir combination, and entecavir. The study was conducted at the National Hepatology and Tropical Medicine Research Institute (NHTMRI), Cairo, Egypt. During the period of April, 2018 till June, 2018, all CHB patient files were reviewed for the NAs interventions used and the 4 years cumulative incidence of resistance. The cumulative incidence of resistance was defined as at least a 10 fold increase in Hepatitis B Virus DNA level from Nadir after initial response (repeated after a month to confirm that the increase is not by chance). RESULTS: Data from 339 CHB treatment adherent patients were included. The majority (n=217) were on lamivudine monotherapy with a resistance of 35%. In tenofovir interventions (n=90), resistance was 1.1%. In lamivudine + adefovir interventions (n=16), resistance was 93.8% which may be attributed to the unavailability of this combination. In entecavir intervention (n=16), resistance was 25%. As majority of the interventions (64%) were lamivudine monotherapy, demographic and biochemical data were analyzed in a regression model to predict risk factors associated with lamivudine resistance; independent risk factor of resistance was HBeAg positive (p=0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Lamivudine was the most frequently prescribed NA for the treatment of CHB in Egypt, with a 4 year cumulative resistance of 35% especially in those with HBeAg positive status. Tenofovir was the agent with the least resistance among the tested NAs interventions in CHB Egyptian patients.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2020-05, ISPOR 2020, Orlando, FL, USA
Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue 5, S1 (May 2020)
Code
PIN5
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Epidemiology & Public Health, Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Adherence, Persistence, & Compliance, Clinical Outcomes Assessment
Disease
Gastrointestinal Disorders, Infectious Disease (non-vaccine)
Explore Related HEOR by Topic