BUDGET IMPACT MODELLING OF CT ANGIOGRAPHY AND PERFUSION IMAGING IN ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE CARE

Author(s)

Boltyenkov A1, Martinez MG1, Pandya A2, Katz JM3, Wang JJ3, Naidich JJ3, Hughes DR4, Sanelli PC3
1Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc., Manhasset, NY, USA, 2Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA, 3Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA, 4Harvey L. Neiman Health Policy Institute, Reston, VA, USA

OBJECTIVES: Stroke has a significant health impact and presents an ongoing challenge for the ongoing availability of healthcare resources. These rising healthcare costs have been partly attributed to the utilization of advanced imaging with CT angiography and perfusion (CTAP). Thus, we investigate the budget impact of implementing advanced imaging for diagnosis and treatment decision-making in acute stroke patients at a comprehensive stroke center (CSC).

METHODS: We employed simulation modeling methods evaluating two hypothetical scenarios: (A) patients with stroke symptoms initially undergo non-contrast-CT (NCCT) and later return to the scanner for angiography (CTA) or angiography and perfusion (CTAP) imaging when endovascular treatment is considered, and (B) all patients with stroke symptoms undergo CTAP as initial imaging. Our institutional data was utilized as model inputs to provide an example of a large healthcare system (n=1506 acute ischemic stroke patients annually). A base-case model was used to calculate the within-hospital per-patient costs needed to achieve the diagnosis. Sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS: There was no initiation cost for advanced imaging for the stroke service. The average per-patient clinical cost for achieving a diagnosis was $631.49 for scenario A and $788.68 for scenario B. The average per-patient treatment costs were $1,344.30 for scenario A and $2,877.30 for scenario B. The overall cost of scenario B is $5,535,294, while the overall cost of scenario A is $2,975,151 in the first year. The overall budget impact of scenario B is $2,560,143 in the first year of implementation.

CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that establishment of advanced imaging is financially feasible and requires no additional investment in overhead CT equipment or personnel. Advanced imaging in stroke care leads to much larger budget impact on the treatment than on diagnostics services. However, hospitals changing their stroke care to advanced imaging need to be prepared to handle significantly higher volume of treatment cases.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2020-05, ISPOR 2020, Orlando, FL, USA

Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue 5, S1 (May 2020)

Code

PND33

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Health Service Delivery & Process of Care, Medical Technologies

Topic Subcategory

Budget Impact Analysis, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Hospital and Clinical Practices, Medical Devices

Disease

Cardiovascular Disorders, Medical Devices, Neurological Disorders

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×