INCREASED COMPLEXITY OF ONCOLOGY THERAPIES NECESSITATES EVOLUTION OF VALUE-BASED AGREEMENTS

Author(s)

Eslami N1, Garfield S2
1Ernst & Young, Malden, MA, USA, 2Ernst & Young, Wayland, MA, USA

OBJECTIVES: There are >300 approved oncology products, with dozens in the pipeline with multiple indications. In addition, combination therapies are increasing, necessitating new methods to assess and allocate value to them. Currently, value based agreements (VBAs) have simple structures and measure one therapy’s impact in isolation or for a single indication. This study explores the current state of oncology VBAs and assesses upcoming near-term combination permutations, identifying new methodologies and technical platforms to support VBA evolution in this increasingly complex area.

METHODS: Publicly available information describing all oncology-related VBAs in the US and EU was collected. Oncology pipelines and marketed product details were collected and reviewed. Analysis of marketed or pipeline combination products and of indication expansions was conducted to quantify complexities and understand effects on VBAs. Current VBA terms were analysed to consider outcome measures, duration, data collection methods, and applicability to combination products or indication expansions.

RESULTS: ~1,200 trials are underway for combination oncology therapies, with 22 indication expansions in 2018. The US has 69 total VBAs, with 7 in oncology, while the EU has 149 VBAs, 77 in oncology. Majority reimburse number of treatment cycles based on responsiveness, while others focus on negative outcomes (e.g. bone breaks). The simple deal parameters for single drugs are not transferable to combination products without adaptation. For indication expansion, current structures may be leveraged to develop RWE for broader value assessment. New tools are needed to assess value allocation for combination therapies with different prices and as treatment become more chronic.

CONCLUSIONS: Oncology VBA methodology adaptations are needed to address the looming complexity of combination products and indication expansion. Additionally, technology platforms for data sharing, analysis of each drug’s value contribution, and adaptive contracting will further efforts. Multi-stakeholder collaboration to develop the new VBA standards will accelerate adoption.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2019-05, ISPOR 2019, New Orleans, LA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 22, Issue S1 (2019 May)

Code

PCN202

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Health Policy & Regulatory, Health Technology Assessment

Topic Subcategory

Performance-based Outcomes, Reimbursement & Access Policy, Risk-sharing Approaches, Value Frameworks & Dossier Format

Disease

Drugs, Oncology

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×