BUDGET IMPACT IN THE USA OF LIPOSOMAL IRINOTECAN AS A POST-GEMCITABINE TREATMENT OPTION FOR PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC PANCREATIC ADENOCARCINOMA (MPC)

Author(s)

Herrera-Restrepo O1, Ferrufino C1, Bilir SP2, Cockrum P3, Valderrama A4
1IQVIA, Falls Church, VA, USA, 2IQVIA, San Francisco, CA, USA, 3Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA, 4Formerly of Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA

OBJECTIVES

:
Liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI; Onivyde), in combination with fluorouracil (5-FU)+leucovorin (LV), is the only category-1 NCCN recommendation for treating post-gemcitabine adult patients with mPC. Given expected increases in nal-IRI use based on guidelines, it may be valuable to understand fiscal implications to US health plans. This study estimates the budgetary consequences of increasing nal-IRI use for treating post-gemcitabine mPC adult patients from a US commercial payer perspective.

METHODS

:
A Microsoft® Excel budget impact model was developed to estimate the one-year fiscal impact for a hypothetical 1-million-member health plan. The treatment-eligible population included mPC patients receiving first-, second-, or third-line post-gemcitabine therapy. Inputs (epidemiology, dosing, direct costs [drug, administration, and monitoring]) were derived from published literature, product labels/clinical trials, Medispan PriceRx, CMS fee schedules, and a de novo real-world study of Medicare AE rates and costs (aligning to the FDA Framework for Real-World Evidence Program). Costs reflect 2018 USD. Market distributions for current and projected scenarios were provided by the manufacturer, including most common mPC treatment options and irinotecan regimens. The budget impact (total annual costs, cost per member per month [PMPM]) was calculated as the difference between current and projected markets. Sensitivity analyses examined the impact of uncertainty (±20% variation) on results.

RESULTS

:
Increased nal-IRI use (1.4%, 21.5%, and 40.2% in first-, second-, and third-line therapy, respectively) in year 1 would cost $0.0001 PMPM (total cost difference of $1,132). Sensitivity analyses across all parameters did not change conclusions (+/- $0.0001 PMPM variation). AE cost offsets are achieved given the lower real-world rate of AEs for nal-IRI versus the most common regimens (FOLFIRINOX and Gemcitabine+Abraxane; e.g., anemia, fatigue, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia).

CONCLUSIONS

:
Increasing access to nal-IRI, in agreement with recent NCCN guidelines for treatment of post-gemcitabine mPC, is budget neutral given the lower real-world rate of AEs compared to common alternatives.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2019-05, ISPOR 2019, New Orleans, LA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 22, Issue S1 (2019 May)

Code

PCN80

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Budget Impact Analysis

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×