ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF IXAZOMIB IN COMBINATION WITH LENALIDOMIDE AND DEXAMETHASONE IN MEXICAN PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE MYELOMA WHO HAVE RECEIVED PREVIOUS THERAPY.
Author(s)
Rubio Ponce R1, Soto Molina H1, Martinez Samano E1, Frias Gasga AE2
1HS Estudios Farmacoeconómicos S.A. de C.V., Mexico City, Mexico, 2Takeda, Mexico City, Mexico
OBJECTIVES To perform a complete economic evaluation of the use of ixazomib in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma who have received previous therapy in Mexico. METHODS : A cost-effective analysis was carried out using a Markov model, taking into account the results obtained with the systematic review of the clinical evidence. The model evaluates the use of Ixazomib in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone for the treatment of patients with Multiple Myeloma who have received previous therapy, against the following treatment regimens: Daratumumab/Lenalidomide/Dexamethasone, Carfilzomib/Lenalidomide/Dexamethasone, Pomalidomide/Bortezomib/Dexamethasone, Bortezomib/Lenalidomide/Dexamethasone and Carfilzomib/Lenalidomide/Dexamethasone, using life-years gained (LYG) as the main outcome. Direct medical costs of each scheme treatment were taken into consideration; the time horizon was 10 years with a discount rate of 5% for health costs and consequences from the perspective of Public Health institutions in Mexico. RESULTS The analysis showed that Ixazomib/Lenalidomide/Dexamethasone is more effective in the treatment of patients with Multiple Myeloma who have at least received one previous therapy with a total of 5.771 LYG, and an average cost of $ 135,486.15 per patient in ten years, generating an ICER of $9,961.18 compared to Bortezomib/Lenalidomide/Dexamethasone, which is the least expensive scheme. Additionally, the results of the sensitivity analysis showed that the model is robust. CONCLUSIONS : Ixazomib/Lenalidomide/Dexamethasone turns out to be the most effective option and the second least expensive option, making it a cost-effective option in the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma that have received prior therapy, being in the threshold between one and two GDP per capita.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2019-05, ISPOR 2019, New Orleans, LA, USA
Value in Health, Volume 22, Issue S1 (2019 May)
Code
PCN55
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Oncology