SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW OF UTILITY STUDIES IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED OR METASTATIC HEPATOCELLULAR CANCER

Author(s)

Mohanty M1, Kiiskinen U2, Fotheringham I3, Jen MH4, Girvan A5
1ICON, PLC, Boston, MA, USA, 2Eli Lilly Finland, Helsinki, 18, Finland, 3ICON plc, London, UK, 4Eli Lilly and Company, Surrey, UK, 5Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA

OBJECTIVES

To systematically identify and assess published, peer-reviewed utility data for patients with advanced or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Comprehensive searches were conducted in major electronic databases, and supplemented by searching congress abstracts and Health Technology Assessment websites on 5th March 2018. No publication date limits were applied but reviews, editorials and non-English language publications were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of eight studies, three randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reporting treatment-specific utilities (0=dead, 1=full health) and five observational studies reporting disease-specific utilities, were included. There was a marked difference in utilities recorded in RCTs (0.67-0.87) compared to observational studies (0.31-0.72). Four studies reported utilities for HCC in the presence of other comorbid conditions including hepatitis C infection (0.51-0.72 elicited from Canadian patients), hepatitis B infection (0.38 from international patient population), and chronic hepatitis B (0.72 from Chinese patients). No other studies reported utilities by HCC severity except a South Korean-based observational study by Ock et al. that reported greater utility scores for the first-line treatments (liver transplantation=0.67, partial hepatectomy=0.61) compared to care for advanced disease stage (palliative therapy=0.39, non-surgical treatment=0.54). Five out of eight studies used EQ-5D for utility elicitation. Identified HCC-specific utility data ranged between 0.31-0.87, though there was notable heterogeneity in the data. Variation was noted in terms of study design, patient population, disease states, and methods of utility elicitation. Nevertheless, some observed trends were consistent across the literature: utilities were greater for milder conditions (e.g., CHB without complications, compensated cirrhosis, patients requiring first-line therapy) than severe conditions (decompensated cirrhosis, advanced HCC).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, there is a paucity of utility data for patients with HCC, which makes drawing further conclusions difficult. Further research is needed, to better understand the impact of the disease on patient quality of life and the potential benefit therapies may offer.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2019-05, ISPOR 2019, New Orleans, LA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 22, Issue S1 (2019 May)

Code

PCN277

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Health State Utilities, Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×