Author(s)
Huynh L1, Wells JC2, Graham J2, Steinharter J3, McGregor B3, Donskov F4, Bjarnason GA5, Vaishampayan U6, Hansen A7, Iafolla M7, Zanotti G8, Chang R1, Cheng WY1, Duh MS1, Heng DYC2
1Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA, USA, 2University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, 3Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA, 4Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark, 5Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada, 6Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA, 7Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada, 8Pfizer, Inc., New York, NY, USA
OBJECTIVES : The IMDC risk model, a well-established prognostic model for mRCC, provides benchmarks for trial design, patient counseling, and risk-specific treatments. Based on six risk factors, the IMDC model categorizes patients as favorable (no factors), intermediate (1 or 2 factors), or poor (≥3 factors). To date, limited studies have examined heterogeneity in the IR group. This study assessed patient characteristics and clinical heterogeneity among mRCC patients in the IMDC IR group who received first-line sunitinib therapy in the real-world setting. METHODS : Clear cell mRCC patients classified as IR who initiated sunitinib as first-line therapy in 2010-2018 were included in this retrospective analysis. Median overall survival (OS) and median time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) from sunitinib initiation was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS : Among patients classified as IR (n=885), the most common risk factors were <1 year from diagnosis to treatment (65%) and anemia (50%). There were 458 and 427 pts in the IMDC IR group who had 1 vs 2 risk factors, respectively. Patients with 1 vs 2 risk factors had significantly lower proportion of brain metastases (8.3% vs 13.5%, P=0.03) and bone metastases (32.3% vs 41.9%, P<0.01), and higher proportion of prior nephrectomy (91.7% vs 81.5%, P<0.01) and prior IL-2/IFN therapy (5.7% vs 2.1%, P<0.01). For patients with 1 vs 2 risk factors, the median OS (95% CI) was 35.1 (31.7-39.6) vs 21.9 (18.5-25.8) months (P<0.01), and the median TTD (95% CI) was 10.3 (8.7-12.0) vs 6.6 (5.6-7.9) months (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS : This real-world study shows that mRCC patients in the IR group are heterogeneous in characteristics and clinical outcomes, with longer OS and TTD in patients with 1 vs 2 risk factors. These findings are consistent with previous analysis of clinical trial data, and should be considered when counseling IMDC IR patients.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2019-05, ISPOR 2019, New Orleans, LA, USA
Value in Health, Volume 22, Issue S1 (2019 May)
Code
PCN22
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Epidemiology & Public Health
Topic Subcategory
Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy, Safety & Pharmacoepidemiology
Disease
Oncology, Urinary/Kidney Disorders