INDIRECT TREATMENT COMPARISONS AND NETWORK META-ANALYSES OF NALDEMEDINE FOR THE TREATMENT OF OPIOID-INDUCED CONSTIPATION

Author(s)

Beale R1, Conway P2, Cai B3, Krauter E3, Langford B1, Hall A4, Eddowes L5
1Costello Medical, London, UK, 2Shionogi Global, oxford, OXF, UK, 3Shionogi Inc, Florham Park, NJ, USA, 4Costello Medical, Cambridge, UK, 5Costello Medical, Cambridge, CAM, UK

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: Opioid treatment often leads to opioid-induced constipation (OIC). We compared the efficacy and safety of naldemedine 0.2mg (NLD), a peripherally-acting mu-opioid receptor antagonist, to alternative OIC treatments.

METHODS: A systematic literature review identified phase III/IV randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of EU-licensed OIC-indicated treatments in adults via searches of MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library from database inception to 14-Jun-2017, and of congresses, reference lists and grey literature. Outcomes at 12 and 52 weeks were assessed using indirect treatment comparisons (ITCs) or network meta-analyses (NMAs).

RESULTS: Of 26 identified placebo/usual care-controlled RCTs, six reported 12-week outcomes (three NLD; two naloxegol 12.5mg [NLX12.5]-vs-naloxegol 25mg [NLX25]; one oxycodone/naloxone). NMAs suggest that NLD was generally comparable to other treatments at 12 weeks for response rate, mean change from baseline in spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs), patient assessment of constipation-symptoms (PAC-SYM) questionnaire, all-cause discontinuation (ACD) and discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs), except that there was a lower risk of discontinuation due to AEs for oxycodone/naloxone over NLD (risk ratio [RR]: 0.22; 95% credible interval [95%CrI]: 0.07, 0.60), and NMAs of SBMs and PAC-SYM favored NLD over NLX12.5 (SBMs: difference -0.82; 95%CrI: -1.33, -0.32; PAC-SYM: difference 0.16; 95%CrI: 0.01, 0.30). ITCs of the two studies reporting 52-week outcomes showed NLD had a lower risk of total AEs (RR: 0.84; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 0.75, 0.94), discontinuation due to AEs (RR: 0.19; 95%CI: 0.07, 0.52) and flatulence (RR: 0.10; 95%CI: 0.03, 0.41) versus NLX25; no statistically significant differences were observed in abdominal pain, ACD, serious AEs, deaths, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting or major adverse cardiac events.

CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy of NLD and NLX25 was similar for OIC treatment, with an improved longer-term safety profile for NLD versus NLX25. 12-week comparisons suggest NLD is superior to NLX12.5 for the treatment of OIC in terms of SBMs and PAC-SYM.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2019-05, ISPOR 2019, New Orleans, LA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 22, Issue S1 (2019 May)

Code

PGI3

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Disease

Gastrointestinal Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×