A COMPARISON OF R PACKAGES FOR PREDICTION AND SIMULATION OF MULTI-STATE MODELS FOR COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS

Author(s)

Incerti D1, Jansen JP2
1Precision Health Economics, Oakland, CA, USA, 2Precision Xtract, Oakland, CA, USA

OBJECTIVES : There are currently a number of software tools in R for prediction and simulation of multi-state models. Our aim was to compare them and assess their applicability for cost-effectiveness analysis.

METHODS : We evaluated open-source software for prediction and simulation of multi-state models. Three R packages (mstate, hesim, and heemod) were considered. They were compared on seven criteria: (i) computational efficiency, (ii) facility for cohort and individual-level modeling, (iii) incorporation of patient heterogeneity, (iv) use of probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA), (v) support for flexible survival modeling, (vi) whether time is continuous or discrete, and (vii) integration with cost-effectiveness analysis.

RESULTS : The hesim package was the fastest and could simulate a parametric individual-level “clock reset” multi-state model with 1,000 patients and 100 PSA iterations thousands of times faster than mstate. Both heemod and hesim can be run for a population of heterogeneous patients, while mstate is designed to simulate a single covariate profile at a time. Likewise, hesim and heemod natively support PSA, while mstate does not. However, heemod is not easily integrated with flexible survival models (e.g., parametric, splines, fractional polynomials, Cox regression), while both mstate and hesim are. Similarly, mstate and hesim are in continuous time while heemod is not. mstate and heemod support both cohort- and individual-level models, while cohort-level models are still under development in hesim. Finally, only hesim and heemod have functions that can be used to directly perform cost-effectiveness analyses and represent decision uncertainty.

CONCLUSIONS : R packages can be used for prediction and simulation of multi-state models. These packages can be used for model-based cost-effectiveness analysis, which can enhance the integration between statistical and economic modeling. However, packages vary in computational efficiency, flexibility, and precision, which should be considered when developing an economic model.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2019-05, ISPOR 2019, New Orleans, LA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 22, Issue S1 (2019 May)

Code

PNS215

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Methodological & Statistical Research

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Modeling and simulation

Disease

No Specific Disease

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×