Author(s)
Fasseeh AN1, George M2, El Rabbat M3, Al Rabayah AA4, Karam R5, Kristensen FB6, Moneim ARIA7, Jameleddine M8, Al-Saggabi AH9, Alowayesh MS10, Abaza S11, Chamova J12, Kalo Z13
11) Eötvös Loránd University; 2) Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Egypt, 2Health Insurance Organization, Cairo, Egypt, 3Middle East and North Africa Health Policy Forum, Cairo, Egypt, 4King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan, 5Lebanese University, Hadath, Lebanon, 6University of Southern Denmark, Hilleroed, Denmark, 7World Health Organization, Cairo, Egypt, 8National Instance for Assessment and Accreditation in Health Care, Tunis, Tunisia, 9Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 10Kuwait University, Jabriyah, Kuwait, 11Syreon Middle East, Cairo, C, Egypt, 12ISPOR, Malmo, Sweden, 131) Eötvös Loránd University; 2) Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, PE, Hungary
OBJECTIVES : Implementation of health technology assessment (HTA) can be an adequate tool to improve the evidence base of policy decisions. Our objective was to assess current status of HTA implementation in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region and to identify middle to long-term objectives by focusing on regional commonalities. METHODS : We conducted an HTA implementation survey among participants of the ISPOR Dubai 2018 conference based on the template developed by Kaló et al (2016). Opinion of respondents on current and preferred future status of HTA implementation in their countries were described related to capacity building, HTA financing, process and organizational structure for HTA, standardization of HTA methodology, use of local data, scope of mandatory HTA, and decision criteria. RESULTS : 54 participants (56% from public sector) from 11 MENA countries filled in the survey. Respondents indicated current limited options for HTA training, but in the future 76% would prefer postgraduate HTA trainings in their own countries. Participants would like to see an increase in public funding on HTA research (13% current vs. 77% preferred) and on critical appraisal of HTA submissions (8% current vs. 70% preferred). 81% of respondents would prefer establishment of public HTA institute(s), however only 13% reported the existence of such agency. 78% of respondents (vs. 8% currently) would mandate the use of local data with need for assessing the transferability of international evidence. In the long-run, 72% would prefer development of patient registries and access to data in payers’ databases. CONCLUSIONS : Our results should be viewed as an initial step in a multi-stakeholder dialogue on HTA implementation. Each MENA country should develop its context specific HTA roadmap, as such roadmaps are not transferable without taking into account country size, GDP per capita, major social values, public health priorities and adopted systems of health care financing.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2019-05, ISPOR 2019, New Orleans, LA, USA
Value in Health, Volume 22, Issue S1 (2019 May)
Code
PNS179
Topic
Health Policy & Regulatory, Health Technology Assessment, Organizational Practices
Disease
No Specific Disease