UNDERSTANDING TEXAS COMMUNITY PHARMACISTS' ATTITUDES TOWARD MANDATED PDMP USE AND SEVEN DAY PRESCRIBING LIMITS ON OPIOID PRESCRIPTIONS FOR ACUTE NON-CANCER PAIN
Author(s)
Iloanusi S1, Fleming ML1, Varisco TJ2, Mohan A3, Yande S2, Sanyal S4, Masurkar P5, Low EV2, Essien EJ4
1College of Pharmacy,University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA, 2College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, HOUSTON, TX, USA, 3College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Houston,, TX, USA, 4University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA, 5College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
OBJECTIVES : Mandated prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP) use and limits on the duration of opioid prescriptions for acute, non-cancer pain are both interventions intended to limit opioid misuse. The state of Texas will require pharmacists to query the PDMP prior to dispensing opioid prescriptions beginning September 1, 2019. The present study seeks to describe community pharmacists’ attitudes towards mandated PDMP use and limited duration acute opioid prescriptions. METHODS : A cross-sectional survey design was used to assess Texas community pharmacy preceptors’ attitudes towards mandated PDMP use and seven-day opioid prescription prescribing limits. Five items scaled on a Likert scale of 1, “Unlikely” to 7, “Likely” were used to assess the expected outcome of each policy change and another five items scaled on a Likert scale ranging from -3, “Undesirable” to +3 “Desirable” were used to assess level of desirability toward each outcome item. Attitudes were defined as the product of outcome expectation and level of desirability toward each behavior and were thus scaled from -21 to 21 with scores over 0 considered “positive” and scores under 0 considered “negative”. The survey instrument was administered online via Qualtrics® using a modified Dillman’s tailored design. A raffle drawing for 15, $50-dollar Amazon gift cards was offered as an incentive. RESULTS : In total, 117 pharmacists were surveyed via email and 23 responses were received (19.7%). Only 35%(N=8) of pharmacists assessed the PDMP for more than 60% of patients while 82%(N=19) had used it in the last week. Most pharmacists (N=17, 74%) had a positive attitude towards mandatory PDMP use while 52%(N=12) of pharmacists had a negative attitude towards the seven-day prescribing limit. CONCLUSIONS : PDMP use was inconsistent among this sample and many held negative perceptions toward limiting the duration of opioid prescriptions for acute pain. Understanding pharmacists’ perceptions of opioid policy is critical to insuring effective implementation.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2019-05, ISPOR 2019, New Orleans, LA, USA
Value in Health, Volume 22, Issue S1 (2019 May)
Code
PDG54
Topic
Epidemiology & Public Health, Health Service Delivery & Process of Care
Topic Subcategory
Pharmacist Interventions and Practices, Public Health
Disease
Drugs, No Specific Disease