COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF NUSINERSEN AND ONASEMNOGENE ABEPARVOVEC FOR INFANTILE-ONSET SPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHY (TYPE I SMA) IN THE US
Author(s)
Thokala P1, Stevenson M2, Kumar VM3, Ren S2, Chapman R3, Ellis A3, Rind D3
1School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK, 2University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK, 3Institute for Clinical and Economic Review, Boston, MA, USA
OBJECTIVES : Patients with infantile-onset spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), a rare, genetic neuromuscular disease, do not achieve key motor function milestones (e.g., sitting) and have short life-expectancy in the absence of treatment. The aim of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of two novel, disease-modifying therapies (nusinersen and onasemnogene abeparvovec) compared to best supportive care (BSC) in patients diagnosed with infantile-onset SMA in the US. METHODS : A de novo economic model was developed with the following health states: ‘permanent ventilation’, ‘not sitting’, ‘sitting’, ‘walking’, and ‘death’. Short-term data were sourced from the respective pivotal clinical trials of nusinersen (ENDEAR) and onasemnogene abeparvovec (CHERISH). Motor function milestones achieved at the end of follow-up in the clinical trials were assumed to be sustained until death. Mortality risks were based on survival modelling of relevant published Kaplan-Meier data. Costs, life years, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were discounted at 3% per annum, and the analysis was performed from a US health care sector perspective. RESULTS : For nusinersen, incremental cost effectiveness ratios did not fall below $1 million per QALY gained in scenario and one-way sensitivity analyses accounting for parametric uncertainty. For onasemnogene abeparvovec, at an assumed placeholder price of $2 million, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios ranged from $205,000 to $412,000 per QALY gained. Results were most sensitive to the length of survival, background health care costs, and utility in the ‘sitting’ and ‘walking’ health states. CONCLUSIONS : The estimated incremental cost-effectiveness of nusinersen and onasemnogene abeparvovec from a US health care sector perspective exceeded commonly-cited cost-effectiveness thresholds of $50,000 to $150,000 per QALY. Cost-effectiveness was dependent on assumptions made about survival, costs, and utilities; and whether the motor function milestones were sustained over lifetime. Given the relatively short-term effectiveness data available for these therapies, a registry to collect long-term data of infantile-onset SMA patients is recommended.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2019-05, ISPOR 2019, New Orleans, LA, USA
Value in Health, Volume 22, Issue S1 (2019 May)
Code
PRO15
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Genetic, Regenerative and Curative Therapies