DESCRIBING ALGORITHM TO ASCERTAIN MEDICATION EXPOSURE MEASUREMENT LEVEL IN PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDIES

Author(s)

Rasu R1, Hunt SL2, Dai J2, Huizhong C2, Phadnis MA2, Jain N3
1University of North Texas Health Sciences Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA, 2University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA, 3University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA

OBJECTIVES: Published pharmacoepidemiological studies use MPR and PDC to calculate medication adherence and usually fail to incorporate hospitalization and coverage overlap/gap from claims data. We created a refined algorithm to capture medication exposure level(MEL) for patients with End Stage Renal Disease(ESRD) who are more frequently hospitalized.

METHODS: United States Renal Data System(USRDS) registry of ESRD claims (Medicare PartA- PartB-PartD) were used to accurately capture entire prescription filling patterns of those receiving new prescriptions for oral P2Y12inhibitors, including clopidogrel(95.19%), prasugrel(2.67%),ticagrelor (2.14%) between 2011-2015. P2Y12 naïve patients were followed until death, kidney transplantation, switching medications, or lost to follow-up. Resulted in patients with median study periods of 367days(IQR:147,1627). After flagging/censoring key variables, algorithm adjustments were made for hospital length of stay(LOS), and medication overlap. Analyses were generated with SAS software.

RESULTS:Hospitalization occurred for 78% of the cohort (n=46,514). Median LOS was 12(IQR:2,34). Median age was 64(IQR:55,73), 54% male, Caucasian(40.6%), majority on hemodialysis(92.9%) with dialysis vintage of 3.8years, modified Liu Index median was 7. Patients were on 7 medications (median:7,IQR:5,10) on the day new P2Y12 was prescribed. The four most common medications were: clopidogrel(95.20%), sevelamer carbonate(24.79%), amlodipine besylate(24.79%), carvedilol(24.49%). Calculated MPR(61.10%, 95%CI:60.79%-61.41%), PDC(59.00%, 95%CI:58.70%-59.30%) using traditional adherence methods and compared findings with refined MEL calculation. MEL adjustment affected 41% of the cohort and 52.7% of the cohort after applying modification for overlap coverage days and hospital stay, respectively. When adjustments for overlap and hospital stay were made concurrently, medication adherence improved 5.78%. Leading to overall MEL 68%(median 0.68,IQR:0.31,0.93). Sensitivity analysis considered restricted medication counts of ≥14days and first ≥30day gap.

CONCLUSIONS: Patients had higher medication exposure level after adjusting for coverage overlap, gap, hospital stays, and other data refinement. This sophisticated algorithm is applicable to other disease condition where all-cause hospitalization burden is higher. Patient insurance eligibility status and hospitalization significantly influence MEL.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2019-05, ISPOR 2019, New Orleans, LA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 22, Issue S1 (2019 May)

Code

PUK30

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Adherence, Persistence, & Compliance, Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Disease

Drugs

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×