THREE METHODS FOR DEFINING ASTHMA EXACERBATIONS IN REAL-WORLD DATA
Author(s)
Bogart M1, Packnett E2, Manjelievskaia J3, Hahn B1, Ortega H4, Bell C1, Llanos JP1
1GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA, 2IBM Watson Health, Bethesda, MD, USA, 3IBM Watson Health, Cambridge, MA, USA, 4Gossamer Bio, San Diego, CA, USA
OBJECTIVES: Asthma exacerbations are a primary research endpoint due to the associated cost burden. The generally accepted claims-based algorithm for identifying exacerbations (non-hospitalized) consists of an office visit with an asthma diagnosis and an oral corticosteroid prescription ±7 days of the visit. However, physician-administered biologic therapies for asthma pose specific challenges to this algorithm, due to requiring scheduled visits for administration. We evaluated 2 adjustments to the standard definition to exclude scheduled visits for biologic administration. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of commercially insured patients using omalizumab, the biologic with most market exposure, was conducted using medical/pharmacy claims 11/1/14 - 9/30/17. Inclusion criteria were 12-months of continuous enrolment in the year prior to (baseline) and post (follow-up) the 1st administration, age ≥12, asthma diagnosis during baseline, and ≥2 doses of omalizumab. Patients administered another asthma biologic were excluded. A post-hoc analysis was conducted using 2 adjustments with increasing refinement to the standard exacerbation definition (#1) which does not exclude scheduled visits; (#2) excluding visits using the omalizumab J-code; and (#3) excluding visits within 28 days of omalizumab administration due to the usual 4-week dosing schedule. RESULTS: 799 patients were identified. Using approach #1, 71.0% of patients in the baseline vs. 63.5% in follow-up had ≥1 asthma exacerbation with a mean(±SD) of 1.7 (1.8) vs. 1.7 (2.1), resulting in no reduction in the exacerbation rate (p=0.837). Using approach #2, 59.6% of patients had ≥1 asthma exacerbation with a mean of 1.5(1.9), resulting in an 11.8% reduction in exacerbation rate (p=0.030). For approach #3, 55.2% of patients had ≥1 asthma exacerbation with a mean of 1.2(1.7), resulting in a 29.4% reduction in exacerbation rate (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that the standard approach for identifying asthma exacerbations for biologic therapies may result in an overestimate of exacerbations due to including scheduled visits for biologic administration.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2019-05, ISPOR 2019, New Orleans, LA, USA
Value in Health, Volume 22, Issue S1 (2019 May)
Code
PRS51
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy, Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies
Disease
Respiratory-Related Disorders