TRENDS IN PRICES AND SPENDING OF SELF-ADMINISTERED DISEASE-MODIFYING SPECIALTY MEDICATIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS

Author(s)

San-Juan-Rodriguez A1, Good C2, Heyman RA3, Parekh N2, Shrank WH2, Hernandez I1
1University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2UPMC Insurance Services Division, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 3UPMC Multiple Sclerosis Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

OBJECTIVES:Our study assessed trends in price, market share, and spending of all self-administered multiple sclerosis (MS) disease-modifying specialty medications in Medicare Part D from 2006-2016.

METHODS:Using Medicare Part D claims data, we extracted claims for self-administered MS disease-modifying specialty medications in 2006-2016. For each medication and year, we calculated:1) annual cost of treatment, based on Medicare Part D gross drug cost data and the recommended dosing regimens approved by the FDA;2) market share, defined as the proportion of treatment year equivalents accounted by every drug; and 3) total spending by year per 1,000 Medicare beneficiaries. We further quantified the contribution of Medicare payments, out-of-pocket costs, low-income cost-sharing (LICS)subsidy, coverage gap discounts, and other payments toward total spending.

RESULTS:Despite growth of therapeutic options, annual cost of treatment more than quadrupled (2006-2016) from $18,660 to $75,847. Trends in annual costs of treatment with each agent increased in parallel and at very similar rates every year. For instance, annual cost of treatment with Copaxone® increased from $17,924 in 2006 to $36,937 in 2010 to $73,682 in 2016. Similarly, treatment with Avonex® costed $18,563 in 2006, $35,836 in 2010 and $74,958 in 2016. Throughout the study period, Copaxone® had the highest market share, followed by Avonex® and Tecfidera®.

Total spending per 1,000 beneficiaries increased by more than 10-fold, from $7,872 in 2006 to $79,411 in 2016. In 2016, Medicare payments accounted for 84.04% of total spending, LICS for 6.19%, out-of-pocket costs for 3.37%, manufacturer coverage gap discounts for 1.74%, and other payments for 4.67%.

CONCLUSIONS:Annual costs of treatment and drug spending of self-administered MS disease-modifying medications drastically increased over a decade despite the growth of therapeutic options. Increased competition in the specialty drug market does not necessarily translate into price declines. Policies to cap year-over-year inflation in the costs of existing products must be considered.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2019-05, ISPOR 2019, New Orleans, LA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 22, Issue S1 (2019 May)

Code

PND60

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Health Policy & Regulatory

Topic Subcategory

Cost/Cost of Illness/Resource Use Studies, Public Spending & National Health Expenditures

Disease

Neurological Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×