COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF SELECTIVE ANTI-IL-23 AGENTS FOR THE TREATMENT OF MODERATE-TO-SEVERE PLAQUE PSORIASIS- A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND NETWORK META-ANALYSIS
Author(s)
Fazioli K1, Agboola FO1, Ellis AG1, Segel C1, Ollendorf DA2, Banken R1, Pearson S1
1Institute for Clinical and Economic Review, Boston, MA, USA, 2Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the comparative effectiveness of anti-interleukin (IL)-23 agents (guselkumab, tildrakizumab, risankizumab) compared with other approved biologic therapies and apremilast in adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. METHODS We systematically identified and reviewed data from Phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the three anti-IL-23 agents, anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF-α) agents (adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, certolizumab pegol), anti-IL-17 agents (secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab), ustekinumab, and apremilast in adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) adjusting for placebo response. Our outcome of interest was treatment response based on 50%, 75%, and 90% reduction in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 50/75/90). RESULTS Forty-eight RCTs with a total of 25,260 patients were included in the NMA. Sixteen of the included trials examined head-to-head comparisons, five of which compared anti-IL-23 agents to anti-TNF-α agents or ustekinumab. NMA showed no statistical difference in achieving PASI 75 when two of the anti-IL-23 agents (guselkumab and risankizumab) were compared. However, both guselkumab and risankizumab were shown to be more effective in achieving PASI 75 than tildrakizumab (relative risk, RR=1.40, 95% credible interval, CrI: 1.24-1.64; RR=1.42, 95% CrI: 1.26-1.66, respectively). In addition, guselkumab and risankizumab were more effective than each anti-TNF-α agent (ranging from RRs of 1.10 for infliximab to 1.74 for etanercept), ustekinumab (RR=1.24, 95% CrI: 1.16-1.35; RR=1.26, 95% CrI: 1.18-1.37, respectively), and apremilast (RR=2.40, 95% CrI: 1.95-3.03; RR=2.44, 95% CrI: 1.98-3.12, respectively). Response based on PASI 75 did not statistically differ between either guselkumab or risankizumab and the anti-IL-17 agents. Similar findings were observed for PASI 50 and 90 outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Based on clinical trial findings, guselkumab and risankizumab provide clinical benefit similar to that of anti-IL-17 agents and may provide incremental benefits in comparison to tildrakizumab, anti-TNF-α agents, ustekinumab, and apremilast.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2019-05, ISPOR 2019, New Orleans, LA, USA
Value in Health, Volume 22, Issue S1 (2019 May)
Code
PBI31
Topic
Clinical Outcomes
Topic Subcategory
Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy
Disease
Biologics and Biosimilars, Systemic Disorders/Conditions