COST-EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MONITORING OF ACTIVE TUBERCULOSIS TREATMENT IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA- A PILOT STUDY
Author(s)
Salcedo J1, Rosales M2, Nuno D2, Suen SC3, Chang AH2
1University of Southern California (USC), Boston, MA, USA, 2Los Angeles Department of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 3University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, USA
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: Tuberculosis (TB) incidence in Los Angeles County, California (5.3 per 100,000) is significantly higher than the US national average (2.8 per 100,000). Directly observed therapy (DOT) is the preferred strategy for active tuberculosis treatment but requires substantial resources. We partnered with the LA County Department of Public Health (LACDPH) to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of AiCure, a novel artificial intelligence (AI) treatment platform that allows for automated treatment monitoring, which may reduce treatment costs. METHODS: We used a Markov model to compare DOT versus AiCure for active TB treatment in LA County. Individuals in the model transitioned between health states at rates estimated using data from a pilot study for AiCure (N=43) and comparable historical controls for DOT (N=71). Costs by treatment arm including personnel, technology, and licensing fees were provided by the LACDPH. We estimated total costs (2017, USD) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) by treatment arm over a 16-month horizon, the longest treatment length observed in the data, to calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and net monetary benefits (NMB) of AiCure. To assess robustness of base results, we conducted deterministic (DSA) and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA). RESULTS: For the average patient, DOT treatment cost $4,894 and generated 1.03 QALYs over 16-months. AiCure treatment cost $3,377 for 1.05 QALYs, indicating that it would be a dominant strategy over DOT. At willingness-to-pay threshold of $150K/QALY, incremental NMB per-patient under AiCure versus DOT was $4,264. In univariate DSA, NMB were most sensitive to vocational nurse wage; however, AiCure remained dominant in all scenarios. In PSA, AiCure was dominant in 86.3% of 10,000 simulations (cost-effective in 96.5%). CONCLUSIONS: AiCure for treatment of active TB is likely to be cost-effective relative to DOT for patients in LA County. Increased use of the novel AI platform could facilitate LACDPH’s vision of TB elimination.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2019-05, ISPOR 2019, New Orleans, LA, USA
Value in Health, Volume 22, Issue S1 (2019 May)
Code
PIN23
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation, Medical Technologies
Topic Subcategory
Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Digital Health, Trial-Based Economic Evaluation
Disease
Infectious Disease (non-vaccine), Medical Devices
Explore Related HEOR by Topic