COST-EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MONITORING OF ACTIVE TUBERCULOSIS TREATMENT IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA- A PILOT STUDY

Author(s)

Salcedo J1, Rosales M2, Nuno D2, Suen SC3, Chang AH2
1University of Southern California (USC), Boston, MA, USA, 2Los Angeles Department of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 3University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, USA

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: Tuberculosis (TB) incidence in Los Angeles County, California (5.3 per 100,000) is significantly higher than the US national average (2.8 per 100,000). Directly observed therapy (DOT) is the preferred strategy for active tuberculosis treatment but requires substantial resources. We partnered with the LA County Department of Public Health (LACDPH) to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of AiCure, a novel artificial intelligence (AI) treatment platform that allows for automated treatment monitoring, which may reduce treatment costs.

METHODS: We used a Markov model to compare DOT versus AiCure for active TB treatment in LA County. Individuals in the model transitioned between health states at rates estimated using data from a pilot study for AiCure (N=43) and comparable historical controls for DOT (N=71). Costs by treatment arm including personnel, technology, and licensing fees were provided by the LACDPH. We estimated total costs (2017, USD) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) by treatment arm over a 16-month horizon, the longest treatment length observed in the data, to calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and net monetary benefits (NMB) of AiCure. To assess robustness of base results, we conducted deterministic (DSA) and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA).

RESULTS: For the average patient, DOT treatment cost $4,894 and generated 1.03 QALYs over 16-months. AiCure treatment cost $3,377 for 1.05 QALYs, indicating that it would be a dominant strategy over DOT. At willingness-to-pay threshold of $150K/QALY, incremental NMB per-patient under AiCure versus DOT was $4,264. In univariate DSA, NMB were most sensitive to vocational nurse wage; however, AiCure remained dominant in all scenarios. In PSA, AiCure was dominant in 86.3% of 10,000 simulations (cost-effective in 96.5%).

CONCLUSIONS: AiCure for treatment of active TB is likely to be cost-effective relative to DOT for patients in LA County. Increased use of the novel AI platform could facilitate LACDPH’s vision of TB elimination.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2019-05, ISPOR 2019, New Orleans, LA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 22, Issue S1 (2019 May)

Code

PIN23

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation, Medical Technologies

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Digital Health, Trial-Based Economic Evaluation

Disease

Infectious Disease (non-vaccine), Medical Devices

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×