ESTIMATION OF THE CLINICAL OUTCOMES AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF DOLUTEGRAVIR/LAMIVUDINE (DTG/3TC) AS A TEST AND TREAT (T&T) ANTIRETROVIRAL (ARV) REGIMEN FOR TREATMENT-NAIVE PATIENTS WITH HIV-1 INFECTION IN THE UNITED STATES
Author(s)
Oglesby A1, Nguyen C1, Jacob I2, Anderson SJ3, McEwan P4, Lopes S5, Ward T4
1ViiV Healthcare, RTP, NC, USA, 2Health Economics and Outcomes Research Ltd, Cardiff, CRF, UK, 3GlaxoSmithKline, Brentford, UK, 4Health Economics and Outcomes Research Ltd, Cardiff, UK, 5ViiV Healthcare, London, UK
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES : Rapid HIV treatment initiation on the day of diagnosis in the absence of laboratory test data, known as immediate test and treat (T&T), is being increasingly employed as a treatment strategy in some communities and states. The 2-drug regimen of DTG/3TC is currently under regulatory review as a comparable alternative to traditional 3-drug regimens (3DRs). This analysis aims to provide an early estimate of the cost-effectiveness of DTG/3TC compared to three other commonly used T&T regimens: DTG+tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine (TAF/FTC); bictegravir (BIC)/TAF/FTC; and boosted darunavir (DRV/c)+TAF/FTC. METHODS : A previously published hybrid decision tree and Markov cohort state transition model was utilized to estimate outcomes in treatment-naïve HIV-1 infected subjects over a lifetime horizon. Efficacy and safety assumptions for each regimen were derived from a network meta-analysis based on published clinical trials. Patients who may not be optimal for DTG/3TC, as defined by a baseline HIV-1 viral load >500k copies/mL, active hepatitis B, or M184V resistance, were assumed to switch therapies after the first month of treatment based on the receipt of laboratory test results; the likelihood of switching was derived from US population estimates. Monthly wholesale acquisition costs were assumed for each regimen. Modelled outcomes included: quality-adjusted-life-years (QALYs), total costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. RESULTS : Few patients (~8.3%) required a switch from DTG/3TC within the first month of T&T. Across all comparisons, DTG/3TC was estimated to be dominant or highly cost-effective, with incremental QALYs of -0.037 to 0.038 and cost-savings ranging from $41,212 to $71,029. In univariate sensitivity analyses, drivers of cost-effectiveness were the proportion of patients requiring a switch in treatment, modelled time horizon, discounting, acquisition costs and treatment duration without response. CONCLUSIONS : DTG/3TC has demonstrated non-inferior efficacy to conventional 3DRs and is highly likely to represent a cost-effective treatment option for treatment-naïve HIV-1 infected patients initiated on treatment through a T&T framework.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2019-05, ISPOR 2019, New Orleans, LA, USA
Value in Health, Volume 22, Issue S1 (2019 May)
Code
PIN29
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Infectious Disease (non-vaccine)