Author(s)
Curry M1, Bae H2, Dieterich D3, Ankoma-Sey V4, Reddy R5, Pan C6, Hann HW7, Tong M8, Kim WR9, Kwo P10, Frazier L11, Milligan S12, Radtchenko J12, Afdhal N1
1Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA, 2St. Vincent Medical Center, Asian Pacific Liver Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 3Icahn School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA, 4Liver Associates of Texas, P.A., Houston, TX, USA, 5University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 6NYU Langone Health, NYU School of Medicine, Flushing, NY, USA, 7Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadephia, PA, USA, 8Huntington Medical Research Institute Liver Center, Pasadena, CA, USA, 9Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA, 10Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA, 11Liver Wellness Center, Little Rock, AR, USA, 12Trio Health Analytics, La Jolla, CA, USA
OBJECTIVES: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is effective for treatment of Hepatitis B but may be associated with bone loss and kidney problems in susceptible individuals. Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) is a novel pro-drug formulation with an improved safety profile for bone loss and renal injury. Here, we assess the clinical experience with TAF for Hepatitis B in the US. METHODS: The TRIO HBV Registry, consisting of 1078 enrolled patients from 6 academic and 4 community-based centers serving 17 US States, was created to understand real-world HBV treatment. Data presented here are limited to 250 registry patients who initiated TAF between Nov 2016 and Apr 2018, received ≥6 months of TAF therapy, and were followed up to 18 months. RESULTS: Characteristics of the study population: median age 52 years, BMI 24.3 kg/m2, male (147/250, 59%), Asian ethnicity (220/250, 88%), HBeAg positive (54/250, 22%), osteopenia/osteoporosis (47/250, 19%), and FIB-4 >3.25 (17/250, 7%). Mean and median TAF duration was 13 months as of data collection. 233/250 (93%) of patients receiving TAF switched from TDF (214/233, 92%), entecavir (16/233, 7%), or other therapies (3/233, 1%). HBV DNA suppression (<2000 IU/ml) increased from 93% (233/250) patients at baseline to 99% after 6 or 12 months TAF (249/250, p=0.001). In paired comparisons, mean eGFR increased 5% from baseline 85.7 to 90.1 ml/min (p<0.001) after 6 months of TAF therapy (n=213) and 4% from baseline 86.9 to 90.5 ml/min (p=0.001) after 12 months of TAF (n=158). Normal ALT (≤29 U/L females, ≤35 U/L males) increased from 71% patients at baseline to 86% after 6 months TAF (n=219, p=0.001) and from 69% at baseline to 87% after 12 months TAF (n=147, p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In US, clinical practice experience with TAF indicates effective HBV suppression and improved renal function and ALT normalization.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2019-05, ISPOR 2019, New Orleans, LA, USA
Value in Health, Volume 22, Issue S1 (2019 May)
Code
PIN9
Topic
Clinical Outcomes
Topic Subcategory
Clinician Reported Outcomes
Disease
Infectious Disease (non-vaccine), Urinary/Kidney Disorders