COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF ERENUMAB VERSUS TOPIRAMATE FOR PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC MIGRAINES TO IDENTIFY THE COST-EFFECTIVE PRICE THRESHOLD IN GREECE

Author(s)

Giannouchos T, Ohsfeldt RL
Texas A&M University School of Public Health, College Station, TX, USA

OBJECTIVES: Erenumab is a new preventive treatment for chronic migraine (CM) which has not yet been priced in Greece. This study evaluated the costs and outcomes of erenumab as a first-line preventative treatment for CM in Greece, compared to topiramate (TPM), an antiepileptic drug often used for CM, focusing on erenumab price thresholds required to attain cost-effectiveness benchmarks.

METHODS: A decision-tree model was used to project costs and outcomes, expressed as migraines avoided and as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), from both a payer and societal perspective. The time-horizon was one year and all costs were calculated in 2018 euros (€). Sensitivity analyses assessed the impact of parameter uncertainty on model results.

RESULTS: From an initial state of no treatment, treatment with erenumab resulted in a reduction of 12 additional migraines per year compared to the reduction for TPM. Using an erenumab price of €203/month (estimated from past pricing of analogous drugs in Greece relative to the US price of $575/month), the estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was €171 per migraine avoided and €186,813 per QALY gained, from a payer’s perspective. Accounting for both medical and non-medical costs (societal perspective), the ICERs were €163.7 per migraine avoided and €178,541 per QALY gained. Using a common existing cost-effectiveness threshold equal to three times local GDP per capita (€49,000 for Greece), for the erenumab ICER fall below this threshold, the erenumab price would have to be no more than €75 (payer perspective) or €83 (societal perspective). However, model results indicated that erenumab, as a second-line treatment for patients who fail TPM treatment, might be considered cost-effective at the €203/month price, with an ICER of €36,760 (payer perspective).

CONCLUSIONS: Erenumab might be cost-effective as a first-line preventative treatment of CM in Greece, but only at a highly reduced price compared to the US price.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2019-05, ISPOR 2019, New Orleans, LA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 22, Issue S1 (2019 May)

Code

PND42

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Health Policy & Regulatory, Health Service Delivery & Process of Care

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Formulary Development, Pricing Policy & Schemes, Thresholds & Opportunity Cost

Disease

Drugs, Neurological Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×