LIXISENATIDE, BASAL INSULIN AND PREMIXED INSULIN FOR THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS INADEQUATELY CONTROLLED BY ORAL ANTIDIABETIC DRUGS- NETWORK META-ANALYSIS AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS

Author(s)

Men P1, Qu S2, Li C3, Zhai S4
1Department of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China, 2IQVIA, Shanghai, China, 3Sanofi, Shanghai, China, 4Department of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital; Institute for Drug Evaluation, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China

OBJECTIVES

:
To compare the efficacy, safety and long-term cost-effectiveness of lixisenatide 20 ug once daily (Lixisenatide) versus basal insulin (BI) and premixed insulin (Premix) once daily for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) inadequately controlled by oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) in China.

METHODS

:
A systematic literature review was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and WanFang database up to July 2018. The network meta-analysis (NMA) was applied to calculate the relative risk (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% credibility interval (95%Crl) within a Bayesian framework. The IQVIA CORE Diabetes model was used to estimate the quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), direct medical costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) from the perspective of China healthcare system.

RESULTS

:
Eleven randomized controlled trials involving 4,511 patients were included in the NMA. There is no significant difference in the HbA1c reduction comparing Lixisenatide with BI (MD=0.27%, 95%Crl: -0.02%, 0.57%) and Premix (MD=0.32%, 95%Crl: -0.01%, 0.66%). Lixisenatide was associated with a statistically significant reduction in the body weight versus BI (MD=-3.22kg, 95% CrI: -5.51kg to -0.94kg) and Premix (MD=-2.68kg, 95%CrI: -5.16kg to -0.20kg). The incidence of symptomatic hypoglycemia was significantly lower for Lixisenatide compared with BI (RR=0.22, 95% CrI: 0.09 to 0.52) and Premix (RR=0.17, 95% CrI: 0.07 to 0.41). The cost-effectiveness analysis indicated that assuming the willingness-to-pay threshold was set at 3 times GDP per capita per QALY in China (RMB 178,980), Lixisenatide was a cost-effective option with ICERs of RMB 72,492/QALY and RMB 140,830/QALY gained versus BI and Premix, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS : For T2DM patients inadequately controlled by OADs, Lixisenatideis is associated with significantly decreased body weight and lower risk of symptomatic hypoglycemia compared with BI and Premix, accompanied by a similar HbA1c reduction. It is a cost-effective treatment alternative in China.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2019-05, ISPOR 2019, New Orleans, LA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 22, Issue S1 (2019 May)

Code

PDB59

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Biologics and Biosimilars, Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×