FACTORS INFLUENCING PREFERENCES FOR GLUCAGON DELIVERY DEVICES AMONG PATIENTS WITH DIABETES, CAREGIVERS, AND ACQUAINTANCES

Author(s)

Bajpai S1, Cambron-Mellott MJ2, Peck E2, Poon JL3, Mitchell B3, Babrowicz J2, Child CJ3, Beusterien K4
1Eli Lilly and Company, CARMEL, IN, USA, 2Kantar Health, New York, NY, USA, 3Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA, 4Kantar Health, Washington DC, DC, USA

OBJECTIVES : People with diabetes (PTs) on insulin are at risk of severe hypoglycemia (SH), a potentially life-threatening event that requires assistance from others. There is significant unmet medical need to improve successful administration of glucagon by caregivers (CGs) and acquaintances (AQs). This study sought to understand perceptions and preferences for two alternate glucagon delivery devices that are currently in development.

METHODS : Qualitative interviews were conducted with PTs, CGs and AQs from a general population panel. Interviews focused on aspirational device features and perceptions about the two devices, nasal glucagon (NG) and autoinjector glucagon (AI) - visuals of the instructions for use were shown. Verbatim transcripts were developed, and a thematic analysis was performed.

RESULTS : 45 (15 PTs, 15 CGs, and 15 AQs) interviews were conducted. The most frequently spontaneously identified aspirational features for a new glucagon device were ease of use (n=29; 64%), including being uncomplicated, pre-mixed/ready-to-use, and can use quickly; small/easy to carry (n=9; 20%); needle-free/no long needles (n=8; 18%); and easy instructions (n=4; 9%). In general, having a glucagon delivery device on hand would make participants feel prepared, protected and confident that others could assist in the event of SH. More participants across all subgroups preferred NG versus AI (n=33; 73% vs. n=12; 27%). Favorable comments about NG included its ease of use and being needle-free; AI comments included familiarity. There may be more hesitation using AI versus NG because of anxiety about needles and locating an injection site. There was more comfort socially with NG, as it was viewed more discreet and less embarrassing; also, it was considered more child-friendly.

CONCLUSIONS : This research suggests that PTs, CGs and AQs prefer a device that is simple and ready to use. NG was generally preferred over an AI primarily because it is less complicated and is needle-free.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2019-05, ISPOR 2019, New Orleans, LA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 22, Issue S1 (2019 May)

Code

PDB94

Topic

Medical Technologies, Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Medical Devices, Stated Preference & Patient Satisfaction

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×