Healthcare Resource Use and Costs Associated with Obesity and Obesity-Related Complications in Saudi Arabia
Author(s)
Al-Omar H1, Alshehri A2, Abanumay A3, Alabdulkarim H4, Alrumaih A5, Eldin M3, Alqhatani S6
1Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Health Technology Assessment Unit, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 2Obesity Medicine Department, Obesity, Endocrine and Metabolism Centre, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 3Novo Nordisk, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 4National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 5Armed Force Medical Services, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 6Liver Transplant Centre, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: To estimate healthcare resource use (HCRU) patterns and financial burden associated with obesity-related complications (ORCs) in public and private healthcare settings in Saudi Arabia.
METHODS: A micro-costing approach was used to estimate HCRU and costs for ten ORCs, including type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), angina, hypertension, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, dyslipidemia, asthma, chronic kidney disease, sleep apnea, and osteoarthritis. HCRU and unit costs were estimated for diagnostic tests/patient; scheduled outpatient visits/patient/year; treatments received; consumables or devices/patient/year; health education programs/patient/year; monitoring tests/patient/year; treatment-related side effects complications/patient/year; and inpatient procedures/patient/year. Estimated overall annual costs per patient were calculated as a weighted average of separate public and private healthcare settings costs.
RESULTS: Healthcare costs in Saudi Arabia for individuals with any ORC ranged from 2165–7558 United States dollars (US$) per year on average. Complications involving heart failure, chronic kidney disease, dyslipidemia, and T2DM were the most expensive ORCs, mainly due to monitoring and/or pharmacological treatment costs. ORCs such as asthma, hypertension, and angina, however, were the least expensive. The costs of private healthcare settings were higher compared with public healthcare settings; the largest differences (2359–2793 US$) were noted for dyslipidemia, T2DM, and osteoarthritis, mainly due to differences in pharmacological treatment costs.
CONCLUSIONS: Saudi Arabia's healthcare system is facing a considerable financial burden from obesity and ORCs. Preventing or delaying ORCs could result in substantial cost-savings for the healthcare system. Healthcare resources used to manage obesity and ORCs could be re-allocated to other healthcare priorities, resulting in improved access and quality of care for all patients. A multifaceted nationwide strategy is a priority to address both weight management and progression of existing complications in people with obesity.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 11, S2 (December 2023)
Code
EE325
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders (including obesity), No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas