Intravitreal Therapies and Their Patterns of Use in Lombardy Region

Author(s)

Foglia E1, Garagiola E1, Bellavia D2, Schettini F1, Asperti F1, Machiavelli A3, Merlo D3, Mainardi G4, Lusuriello P4, Franzin M5, Soliveri N5, Lombardo R6, Ventura L6, Pieri G7, Punzi C7, Fazio M8, Di Carlo C8, Ferrario LB9
1LIUC University, Castellanza, Varese, Italy, 2LIUC University, Castellanza, VA, Italy, 3ASST Cremona, Cremona, Cremona, Italy, 4ASST Valle Olona, Busto Arsizio, Varese, Italy, 5ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy, 6ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milano, Milano, Italy, 7IRCCS Humanitas, Milano, Milano, Italy, 8San Raffaele Research Institute, Milano, Milano, Italy, 9LIUC University, Castellanza, Italy

OBJECTIVES: To investigate drugs’ utilization and prescribing practices concerning wet age-related macular degeneration (wAMD), retinal vein occlusion (RVO), diabetic macular edema (DME) and choroidal neovascularization (CNV) licensed intravitreal therapies, providing Lombardy Region real-world evidence.

METHODS: In 2022-2023, a retrospective observational multi-center study, based on anonymous data from pharmacy databases, was conducted in 8 Italian hospitals. Treatment-naïve wAMD, RVO, DME, and CNV eyes, receiving an intravitreal injection from 06/01/2019 to 12/31/2020, were included. A 24-month time horizon was assumed. The typology of administered drugs and number of intravitreal injections were collected.

RESULTS: 3,858 eyes were diagnosed for a maculopathy. 53% received treatment up to 24 months.

Focusing on wAMD (N=2,112;55%), considering a single-year treatment (42%) eyes received on average 2.99±0.08, 3.39±0.11 and 2.94±0.12 injections with aflibercept, bevacizumab and ranibizumab. Assuming 24 months, eyes (58%) received on average 8.39±0.32, 8.26±0.22 and 8.40±0.39 injections with the above drugs.

Out of 944 DME eyes, 50% received a single-year treatment, with 3.69±0.19, 2.75±0.22, 1.67±0.06, 3.49±0.27 aflibercept, bevacizumab, dexamethasone and ranibizumab. On average, one fluocinolone acetonide and triamcinolone acetonide implant was delivered. Within a 24-month timeframe, 7.91±0.33 aflibercept, 6.18±0.59 bevacizumab, 6.94±0.48 dexamethasone and 4.46±0.18 ranibizumab injections were administered.

3.32±0.15, 3.31±0.24 and 1.43±0.06 was registered for RVO eyes treated for a 12-month time-period (N=301), considering aflibercept, ranibizumab and dexamethasone. Within 24 months (N=228), 8.91±0.70 ranibizumab, 7.45±0.33 aflibercept or 3.44±0.15 dexamethasone injections were performed.

Most CNV eyes (N=165;60%) received a single-year treatment, with 2.85±0.27 ranibizumab and 2.37±0.12 aflibercept injections. 40% of eyes treated for 24 months, were administered with 6.37±0.34 ranibizumab and 8.25±1.12 aflibercept injections.

CONCLUSIONS: Given the differences between real-life practices and suggested therapeutical schemes, results could support hospitals in the management of maculopathies, revealing the need of optimization strategies, also in preparation to the future introduction of new mechanisms of action and biosimilars of ranibizumab and aflibercept.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2023-11, ISPOR Europe 2023, Copenhagen, Denmark

Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 11, S2 (December 2023)

Code

RWD101

Topic

Study Approaches

Disease

Drugs, Sensory System Disorders (Ear, Eye, Dental, Skin)

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×