Five-Year Budget Impact of Community-Based HIV Testing Strategies for Oral Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Scale-up in Western Kenya: A Modeling Analysis

Author(s)

Cox S1, Wu L1, Wittenauer R1, Nwogu I1, Clark S1, Roberts DA1, Vitruk O1, Kuo AP1, Johnson C2, Jamil MS2, Sands A2, Schaefer R2, Baggaley R2, Stekler JD1, Akullian A3, Sharma M1
1University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA, 2World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 3Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA

OBJECTIVES: Despite the high efficacy of oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in preventing HIV acquisition, uptake is below global targets in sub-Saharan Africa. Community-based oral PrEP provision using HIV self-testing (HIVST) has the potential to expand PrEP coverage. We modeled the budget impact of PrEP provision utilizing different HIV testing modalities in a pharmacy-based setting, including costs incurred and averted.

METHODS: We parameterized an agent-based network model, EMOD-HIV, to assess the undiscounted budget impact of PrEP scale-up in western Kenya between 2022-2026. We evaluated community-based PrEP provision using HIVST (oral-fluid, blood-based) and rapid diagnostic tests detecting antibodies (Ab RDT), compared to no PrEP provision. We assumed individuals 18-49 years with ≥1 sexual partner and screening HIV-negative were eligible to initiate PrEP. HIV test performance and financial costs were based on literature review and expert opinion. PrEP provision costs were derived from pharmacy-based implementation trials. Results are presented in 2021 $USD with 95% credible intervals (CI) from the healthcare perspective.

RESULTS: At an average PrEP coverage of 5%, our model projected to avert 17% of new HIV acquisitions among adults 18-49 years across scenarios. The population prevalence of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance was 5%. The costs of implementing PrEP were similar using oral HIVST (US$327.4 million, 95% CI: US$302.4-US$346.5), blood HIVST (US$350.3 million, 95% CI: US$324.7-US$369.2), and Ab RDT (US$315.9 million, 95% CI: US$291.9-US$333.3). The difference in HIVST costs is attributed to different average commodity costs (oral: US$2.50, blood: US$5.00). Costs of care for HIV-related illness were lower in PrEP scenarios (≤12%) compared to the no PrEP scenario (43%). The largest component costs of PrEP scale-up were PrEP provision costs (49%-54%).

CONCLUSIONS: The estimated budget impacts of pharmacy-based PrEP scale-up were comparable across HIVST and RDT Ab testing modalities in western Kenya. Results can inform stakeholder decision-making for HIV-testing for PrEP implementation in community settings.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2023-11, ISPOR Europe 2023, Copenhagen, Denmark

Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 11, S2 (December 2023)

Code

EE334

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Health Policy & Regulatory, Methodological & Statistical Research

Topic Subcategory

Budget Impact Analysis, Public Spending & National Health Expenditures

Disease

Drugs, Infectious Disease (non-vaccine), Reproductive & Sexual Health

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×