Trends in Medical Device Reimbursement Decisions in South Korea: A Novel and Comprehensive Analysis
Author(s)
Lee C1, Champion D2, Raman D2
1Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore, 2ANSEA Consulting, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: The Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) facilitates pharmaceutical and medical device reimbursement in South Korea. Medical device reimbursement follows a complex pathway encompassing Medical Services (MS) and Medical Materials (MM). To address gaps in literature around HIRA’s decision outcomes regarding medical devices, this study aims to present these trends and key factors for rejections to help improve submission quality.
METHODS: Publicly available data between January 2020 to March 2023, retrieved from MS and MM Assessment Reports on HIRA’s database, was analysed for decision outcomes and key factors associated with non-reimbursement. These were classified into economic, clinical, and procedural, with sub-categories like low cost-effectiveness, non-reimbursement of related MS.
RESULTS: Reimbursement decisions for 117 MS and 212 MM were analysed. Findings for MS showed, 54% with full reimbursement, 26% selective reimbursement and 20% non-reimbursement. Notably, full reimbursement rates declined from 2020-2022 (69% to 45%) while non-reimbursement rates increased (2% to 34%). Major rejection reasons were insufficient evidence (28%), no unmet need (17%) and similar MS not reimbursed (14%).
Findings for MM showed, 55% with full reimbursement, 16% selective reimbursement, 22% covered under procedure fee and 8% non-reimbursement. Major rejection reasons included ‘similar’ MM not reimbursed (27%) and ‘related’ MS not reimbursed (23%). This highlights that applicants requesting MM reimbursement must review the reimbursement status of the related MS. Additionally, MM are increasingly being funded "under procedure fee" rather than "non-reimbursement", which ensures its reimbursement specifically under the related MS while simultaneously preventing manufacturers from setting high prices.CONCLUSIONS: The analysis reveals HIRA’s high reimbursement rate for medical devices and provides unprecedented evidence on common reasons for rejections. To improve submission quality, manufacturers must effectively demonstrate the unmet need, clinical effectiveness in relevant patients and consider the potential impact of reimbursement status of related MS on their submissions.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 11, S2 (December 2023)
Code
HTA120
Topic
Health Technology Assessment, Medical Technologies
Topic Subcategory
Decision & Deliberative Processes, Diagnostics & Imaging, Medical Devices
Disease
No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas