Clinical Outcomes in Non-Inhibitor Severe Haemophilia A Patients Receiving Prophylaxis Across Currently Available Haemophilia A Treatments: Insights Form the ‘Cost of Haemophilia: A Socioeconomic Survey III’ (CHESS III) Study
Author(s)
Blenkiron T1, Hinds D2, Santos S3, Burke T4, Ferri Grazzi E5
1HCD Economics, The Innovation Centre, Daresbury, UK, 2BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc., Oakland, CA, USA, 3BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc., London, UK, 4HCD Economics, Daresbury, Warrington, WRT, UK, 5HCD Economics, Daresbury, , CHW, UK
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: The use of different treatment options to manage people with severe haemophilia A (PwSHA) continues to evolve. This analysis aimed to quantify the clinical burden across treatment classes among adult PwSHA receiving prophylaxis in Europe and the Unites States.
METHODS: Cross-sectional data on PwSHA with no inhibitor history on prophylaxis from the ‘Cost of Haemophilia: a Socioeconomic Survey III’ (CHESS III) dataset were described, stratified by current treatment class (extended half-life [EHL] factor VIII (FVIII), standard half-life/plasma-derived [SHL/PD] FVIII, and non-factor treatment [NFT]). Demographic/clinical information was reported by treating physicians, whilst impairment was reported by PwSHA via the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) tool.
RESULTS: Overall, 333 PwSHA were included, with a mean [SD] age of 35.4 [13.7] and BMI of 25.3 [4.0]. Annual bleed rate and annual spontaneous bleed rate were lowest for the EHL cohort (n=62) at 1.3 [1.3] and 0.6 [1.0], respectively, followed by SHL/PD (n=68; 1.7 [3.3]; 1.4[2.8]) and NFT (n=203; 2.4 [4.9]; 1.6 [3.3]). In the latter cohort, target joints and problem joints were more common compared to the other cohorts, which may be related with the higher bleeding frequencies.
Seventy percent (n=232) of all patients were reported to suffer from some level of chronic pain, with moderate/severe levels reported in 16% (n=11), 19% (n=12) and 27% (n=54) of the SHL/PD, EHL and NFT cohorts, respectively. Of the PwSHA with available work productivity loss (WPL) (n=53) and activity impairment (AI) (n=75) data, WPL ranged from 56.0 (28.6) for EHL to 15.0 (21.2) for SHL/PD, while AI ranged from 56.7 (24.1) for EHL to 42.9 (29.3) for NFT.CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcomes showed variation across treatment classes and were observed to be worse for NFTs, particularly for bleeding outcomes. Despite a range of therapeutic options being available, these results suggest remaining unmet need among non-inhibitor SHA patients receiving prophylaxis.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 11, S2 (December 2023)
Code
RWD63
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation, Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Clinician Reported Outcomes, Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes, Work & Home Productivity - Indirect Costs
Disease
No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas, Systemic Disorders/Conditions (Anesthesia, Auto-Immune Disorders (n.e.c.), Hematological Disorders (non-oncologic), Pain)