Evaluation and Reimbursement of Digital Therapeutics in Germany, France, Belgium and England

Author(s)

Tokarska J1, Foxon G2, Zakrzewska K3, Craddy P4
1Remap Consulting UK Ltd, Macclesfield, CHE, UK, 2Remap Consulting UK Ltd, Macclesfield, CHESHIRE, UK, 3Johnson & Johnson Medical GmbH, Zug, Switzerland, 4Remap Consulting GmbH, ZUG, ZG, Switzerland

OBJECTIVES: This study compares and contrasts the evaluation and reimbursement pathways for digital therapeutics (DTx) in Germany, France, Belgium and England.

METHODS: Four frameworks for DTx assessment: the German DiGA fast track, the French PECAN fast track, the Belgium mHealth Pyramid, and the English Early Value Assessment (EVA) were reviewed to compare and contrast their objectives, methodology, and eligibility criteria.

RESULTS: DiGA and PECAN fast tracks aim to accelerate reimbursement for eligible DTx. Both processes offer a one-year transitional reimbursement period to collect patient data that can be used in determining product value and achieving permanent reimbursement.

The mHealth Pyramid focuses on informative function and categorizes DHAs based on functionality, compliance, and health-economic value, offering funding potential only to those meeting higher-level criteria. The English Early Value Assessment evaluates the clinical and cost-effectiveness of DTx among other medical technologies to inform local funding decisions and support the generation of meaningful real-world data.

Across frameworks, assessed DTx must be CE-marked and meet safety and interoperability criteria. Reimbursement eligibility varies: Germany includes class I and IIa DTx, while France evaluates class IIb, III, and telemonitoring devices under PECAN, with DiGA focusing on potential positive health effects and PECAN prioritizing clinical benefits or improved care organization. In the mHealth Pyramid framework, only apps that enable remote diagnosis, therapy, or monitoring by healthcare providers are eligible for funding. NICE DTx out of those have Digital Assessment Criteria (DTAC) approval for evaluation in the EVA process based on their potential to address prioritized national unmet needs.

CONCLUSIONS: As a result of the distinct differences in the objectives and methodology employed to assess the value of DHAs across countries, companies need adopt a country-specific approach, resulting in increased costs and resources, in order to facilitate patient access across the EU.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2023-11, ISPOR Europe 2023, Copenhagen, Denmark

Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 11, S2 (December 2023)

Code

PT21

Topic

Health Policy & Regulatory

Topic Subcategory

Reimbursement & Access Policy

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×